Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6158Re: DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:45
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:45
68 lines
5415 bytes
5415 bytes
On Nov 9, 6:28 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065 > "These "cosmic bullets" are the highest energy particles in the > universe, packing wallops 100 time higher than anything produced in > the most powerful atom smasher on Earth. Scientists have long been > tantalized by glimpses of this rare variety of cosmic rays and > conflicting explanations for their existence abounded, even > challenging Einstein's theory of special relativity." > > How can these "cosmic bullets" challenge Einstein's theory of special > relativity? Has their "highest energy" anything to do with their > speed? > > http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/275065 > "Another positive part of the story is that special relativity has > survived its most severe test," Smolin said. > > Frenchmen would say: "Oh la la oh la la oh oh!". How "cosmic bullets" > challenged Einstein's special relativity and how Einstein's special > relativity survived in the end will probably remain a secret. At least > nobody in Einstein zombie world would ever ask Einsteinians to > explain. Unlike Frenchmen, Anglophones say "Uh oh Einstein" in such cases. But some mystery always remains so that, if Einstein's false light postulate is to be attacked, this could only be done by Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute. Only Lee Smolin in the Perimeter Institute knows how Einstein criminal cult can extract money from attacks against Einstein's false light postulate: http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10/03/high-energy-gamma-rays-go-slower-than-the-speed-of-light/ "The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right? Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein." http://edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03/smolin03_index.html Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin, and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is observed? The most severe possibility is that the principle of relativity simply fails....But there is another possibility. This is that the principle of relativity is preserved, but Einstein's special theory of relativity requires modification so as to allow photons to have a speed that depends on energy. The most shocking thing I have learned in the last year is that this is a real possibility. A photon can have an energy-dependent speed without violating the principle of relativity!" Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1194677127.822819.101560@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194625738.212829.167640@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,9e88c881a53ef8f X-Google-Thread: 10b271,9e88c881a53ef8f X-Google-Thread: f74ae,9e88c881a53ef8f X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9e88c881a53ef8f X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,9e88c881a53ef8f X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: DELIBERATELY AMBIGUOUS EINSTEINIANS Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:45:27 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 69 Message-ID: <1194677127.822819.101560@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1194625738.212829.167640@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.163 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194677128 25289 127.0.0.1 (10 Nov 2007 06:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 06:45:28 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1194625738.212829.167640@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.163; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0