🚀 go-pugleaf

On 3 Nov, 19:17, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9412/9412064v1.pdf
> WAS EINSTEIN 100% RIGHT? Thibault Damour: "However, some
> recent theoretical findings (existence of non-perturbative strong-field
> effects, natural cosmological attraction toward zero scalar couplings)
> suggest that the present agreement between Einstein's theory and
> experiment might be a RED HERRING...
>
> [hanson]
> .... because as long as GR uses in each & every one of its "solutions"
> the venerable and humble "G" of Newton,  GR remains a crock o'shit,
> a con and the preferred sex attractant for Einstein's Dingleberries
> to engage in their mental masturbations over it  and present  their
> ejaculates in arxiv.org... ahahahahaha... The much maligned bearer of
> truth and not so glad tidings for the Einstein Dingleberries, poster
> Androcles has illustrated and highlighted WHY the sickly Einstein-con
> and its contrived experiments for REL do always seem to be a lovely
> manufactured but phony agreement. See here: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/MC2.htm
>
> Since the Criminal cult... ahahaha...  of the  Einstein Dingleberries is
> a deeply religious fundamentalist lot in regards to physics, not mine
> nor your comments, Pentcho, will  or canshake their faith...  The Pope,
> the Imam or the Grand Rabbi do envy the religious zeal, the devotion
> and fanatizism that these disciples aka Einstein's  Dingleberries
> do exhibit... Thanks for the laughs.....   ahahahaha... ahahanson

It would be curious to see if former members of the axed Reading's
physics department are still "deeply religious":

http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2154

If they are, then the "POTENTIALLY irreversible decline of UK science"
is ACTUALLY irreversible.

Pentcho Valev