Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6202Re: THE POSTULATES OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:51
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:51
121 lines
7538 bytes
7538 bytes
On 3 Nov, 23:37, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote: > "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com... > > > > > On 3 Nov, 19:17, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote: > >> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9412/9412064v1.pdf > >> WAS EINSTEIN 100% RIGHT? Thibault Damour: "However, some > >> recent theoretical findings (existence of non-perturbative strong-field > >> effects, natural cosmological attraction toward zero scalar couplings) > >> suggest that the present agreement between Einstein's theory and > >> experiment might be a RED HERRING... > > >> [hanson] > >> .... because as long as GR uses in each & every one of its "solutions" > >> the venerable and humble "G" of Newton, GR remains a crock o'shit, > >> a con and the preferred sex attractant for Einstein's Dingleberries > >> to engage in their mental masturbations over it and present their > >> ejaculates in arxiv.org... ahahahahaha... The much maligned bearer of > >> truth and not so glad tidings for the Einstein Dingleberries, poster > >> Androcles has illustrated and highlighted WHY the sickly Einstein-con > >> and its contrived experiments for REL do always seem to be a lovely > >> manufactured but phony agreement. > >> See here:http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/MC2.htm > > >> Since the Criminal cult... ahahaha... of the Einstein Dingleberries is > >> a deeply religious fundamentalist lot in regards to physics, not mine > >> nor your comments, Pentcho, will or canshake their faith... The Pope, > >> the Imam or the Grand Rabbi do envy the religious zeal, the devotion > >> and fanatizism that these disciples aka Einstein's Dingleberries > >> do exhibit... Thanks for the laughs..... ahahahaha... ahahanson > > [Pentcho] > > It would be curious to see if former members of the axed Reading's > > physics department are still "deeply religious": > >http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2154 > > If they are, then the "POTENTIALLY irreversible decline of UK science" > > is ACTUALLY irreversible. > > Pentcho Valev > > [hanson] > Since you mention the word "POTENTIALLY", the sordid Dingleberry > behavior of Einstein's criminal cult is reminiscent of the Green fanatics. > EDs show the same persistent religious mentation in their machinations > as do the Enviro turds. For both, their cultism is nothing but a cover-up > to make money in their "criminal" enterprises... > == Fuck the environment... Fuck physics, but use it to make $$$ ===. > I think you have alluded to that issue in some earlier posts of yours. --- > Unfortunately that financial argument is mute to the disciple mind-set of > Einstein Dingleberries, cuz students are forced to swallow that REL shit > and "teachers" use it as a basis for their livelihood. > The ED scam-scheme works as follows in the real world: > > == mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit" > == *.edu and grantology ..................."does need REL - No shit" > == Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload" > == Jews protect it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not". > > Even Einstein himself ruefully concluded shortly before > his death when he confessed, in 1954, to Besso, that: > > ::: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based > ::: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that > ::: case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation > ::: theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- A.E. > > ... Einstein finally admitted and saw the wisdom of is mentor > Max Planck who said more than half a century earlier to A.E.: > > ::: "Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our > ::: disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." > ::: [Max Planck, ~1894] > > echoed by current luminaries, a century later, when looking back like > > ::: Professor Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman), > ::: who said > ::: "It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the 20th century > ::: will be characterized in history as the dark ages of physics." > > ::: or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future, > ::: Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, essentially > ::: associated with the names of Marx, Freud and Einstein" Just another relevant quotation: http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_RelishArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173353364648&path=!entertainment!general!&s=1037645508970 As for relativity, the last word is spoken by John Beckman, an astronomy professor and Einstein disciple. "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of reality? That is probably more a matter of faith than of proof." http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/EinsteinPics/Einsteine.jpg http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-7/images/devine_einstein.mp3 http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=67029 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6021062802503084301&total=62&start=30&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7 Pentcho Valev > > IOW, all that was done since Einstein's con-job got blown all out of > proportions are technology engineering developments (NOT based > on SR/GR), but no new physics emerged except the loud clankering > by Einstein's Dingleberries, who moved ever closer to his sphincter, > a nuisance which Einstein himself tried to shake loose ever since > 1920, when he admonished his ED's with that they "should NOT > search at the same, now well lit places, where he, Einstein, had been > working". > > PS: > Einstein's Anus Mirabilis (Albert's sphincter where his EDs worship)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9e824b27dab62a0d > > Thanks for the laughs, Pentcho.... ahahaha... ahahahanson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1194159100.070278.226000@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194075281.414130.170880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <k22Xi.1173$b%1.145@trnddc01> <1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,9b93b482a2d45772 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,9b93b482a2d45772 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,9b93b482a2d45772 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9b93b482a2d45772 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,9b93b482a2d45772 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: THE POSTULATES OF GENERAL RELATIVITY Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:51:40 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 122 Message-ID: <1194159100.070278.226000@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1194075281.414130.170880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <k22Xi.1173$b%1.145@trnddc01> <1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.160 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194159100 26578 127.0.0.1 (4 Nov 2007 06:51:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 06:51:40 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.160; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0