🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6202

Re: THE POSTULATES OF GENERAL RELATIVITY

#6202
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:51
121 lines
7538 bytes
On 3 Nov, 23:37, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On 3 Nov, 19:17, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> >> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9412/9412064v1.pdf
> >> WAS EINSTEIN 100% RIGHT? Thibault Damour: "However, some
> >> recent theoretical findings (existence of non-perturbative strong-field
> >> effects, natural cosmological attraction toward zero scalar couplings)
> >> suggest that the present agreement between Einstein's theory and
> >> experiment might be a RED HERRING...
>
> >> [hanson]
> >> .... because as long as GR uses in each & every one of its "solutions"
> >> the venerable and humble "G" of Newton,  GR remains a crock o'shit,
> >> a con and the preferred sex attractant for Einstein's Dingleberries
> >> to engage in their mental masturbations over it  and present  their
> >> ejaculates in arxiv.org... ahahahahaha... The much maligned bearer of
> >> truth and not so glad tidings for the Einstein Dingleberries, poster
> >> Androcles has illustrated and highlighted WHY the sickly Einstein-con
> >> and its contrived experiments for REL do always seem to be a lovely
> >> manufactured but phony agreement.
> >> See here:http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/MC2.htm
>
> >> Since the Criminal cult... ahahaha...  of the  Einstein Dingleberries is
> >> a deeply religious fundamentalist lot in regards to physics, not mine
> >> nor your comments, Pentcho, will  or canshake their faith...  The Pope,
> >> the Imam or the Grand Rabbi do envy the religious zeal, the devotion
> >> and fanatizism that these disciples aka Einstein's  Dingleberries
> >> do exhibit... Thanks for the laughs.....   ahahahaha... ahahanson
>
> [Pentcho]
> > It would be curious to see if former members of the axed Reading's
> > physics department are still "deeply religious":
> >http://www.ucu.org.uk/index.cfm?articleid=2154
> > If they are, then the "POTENTIALLY irreversible decline of UK science"
> > is ACTUALLY irreversible.
> > Pentcho Valev
>
> [hanson]
> Since you mention the word  "POTENTIALLY", the sordid Dingleberry
> behavior of Einstein's criminal cult is reminiscent of the Green fanatics.
> EDs show the same persistent religious mentation in their machinations
> as do the Enviro turds. For both, their cultism is nothing but a cover-up
> to make money in their "criminal" enterprises...
> == Fuck the environment... Fuck physics, but use it to make $$$ ===.
> I think you have alluded to that issue in some earlier posts of yours. ---
> Unfortunately that financial argument is mute to the disciple mind-set of
> Einstein Dingleberries, cuz students are forced to swallow that REL shit
> and "teachers"  use it as a basis for their livelihood.
> The ED scam-scheme works as follows in the real world:
>
> == mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit"
> == *.edu  and grantology ..................."does need REL - No shit"
> == Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload"
> == Jews protect it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not".
>
> Even Einstein himself ruefully concluded shortly before
> his death when he confessed, in 1954, to Besso, that:
>
> ::: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
> ::: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that
> ::: case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
> ::: theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- A.E.
>
> ... Einstein finally admitted and saw the wisdom of is mentor
> Max Planck who said  more than half a century earlier to A.E.:
>
> ::: "Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our
> :::  disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination."
> ::: [Max Planck, ~1894]
>
> echoed by current luminaries, a century later, when looking back like
>
> ::: Professor Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
> ::: who said
> ::: "It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the 20th century
> ::: will be characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
>
> ::: or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
> ::: Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, essentially
> ::: associated with the names of Marx,  Freud and Einstein"

Just another relevant quotation:

http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_RelishArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1173353364648&path=!entertainment!general!&s=1037645508970
As for relativity, the last word is spoken by John Beckman, an
astronomy professor and Einstein disciple. "The theory of relativity
lives on. Is it a true picture of reality? That is probably more a
matter of faith than of proof."

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/EinsteinPics/Einsteine.jpg

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-7/images/devine_einstein.mp3

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=67029

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6021062802503084301&total=62&start=30&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

Pentcho Valev


>
> IOW, all that was done since Einstein's con-job got blown all out of
> proportions are technology engineering developments (NOT based
> on SR/GR), but no new physics emerged except the loud clankering
> by Einstein's Dingleberries, who moved ever closer to his sphincter,
> a nuisance which Einstein himself tried to shake loose ever since
> 1920, when he admonished his ED's with that they "should NOT
> search at the same, now well lit places, where he, Einstein, had been
> working".
>
> PS:
> Einstein's Anus Mirabilis (Albert's sphincter where his EDs worship)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/9e824b27dab62a0d
>
> Thanks for the laughs, Pentcho.... ahahaha... ahahahanson
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1194159100.070278.226000@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1194075281.414130.170880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <k22Xi.1173$b%1.145@trnddc01> <1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,9b93b482a2d45772
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,9b93b482a2d45772
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,9b93b482a2d45772
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9b93b482a2d45772
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,9b93b482a2d45772
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: THE POSTULATES OF GENERAL RELATIVITY
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:51:40 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 122
Message-ID: <1194159100.070278.226000@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1194075281.414130.170880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <k22Xi.1173$b%1.145@trnddc01>
   <1194114646.049706.261390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
   <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.160
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194159100 26578 127.0.0.1 (4 Nov 2007 06:51:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 06:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <0S5Xi.1521$Zz.1265@trnddc07>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.160;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0