Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6235Re: SHOULD EINSTEINIANS BE BROUGHT TO COURT?
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:49
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:49
82 lines
6113 bytes
6113 bytes
On 25 Oct, 08:00, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=5538 > Paul Davies: "WAS EINSTEIN WRONG? In recent years a few maverick > scientists have claimed that the speed of light might not be constant > at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great Revolution in > Science is just around the corner? Well, maybe. According to one of > those scientists, Portuguese-born, London-based Joao Magueijo, cracks > are appearing in Einstein's theory of relativity - the cornerstone of > our present understanding of space, time and gravitation." > > That was written three years ago. Did Magueijo and his accomplice Paul > Davies really expect that "the next Great Revolution in Science is > just around the corner"? If they had really had those expectations, > then now, three years later, they should take their heads out of the > sand and say: "Well, we were wrong, in the end we have seen no Great > Revolution around the corner, sorry, from now on we shall sing "Divine > Einstein" even more fiercely": > > http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/EinsteinPics/Einsteine.jpg > http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm > http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-7/images/devine_einstein.mp3 > > However Magueijo and his accomplice Paul Davies do not wish to take > their heads out of the sand and this shows that the shock and horror > declared three years ago had to make their books bestsellers, to bring > them a lot of money etc. Magueijo and his accomplice Paul Davies > should be taken to court some day. > > Another example: > > http://www.totse.com/en/technology/space_astronomy_nasa/ftltravl.html > [From "The Sunday Times" (UK) 13th August 1995] > "ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL. It is boldly > going where no reputable scientific body has gone before. > Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical > Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be > able to travel faster than the speed of light. The breakthrough means > that Star Trek fantasies of interstellar civilisations and voyages > powered by warp drive are now no longer the exclusive domain of > science fiction writers...Crawford argues that modern physics may > allow two possible ways around Einstein's theory....The theories will > boost growing interest among scientists in the possibility of > travelling faster than light. The IPS, whose members include several > NASA engineers, starts its first conference shortly in Halifax, Nova > Scotia." > > The same problem. Shock and horror 12 years ago, Star Trek fantasies > are nothing compared to what the Royal Society has just discovered in > a purely scientific manner, two ways arond Einstein's theory.....Now, > 12 years later, heads in the sand, "Divine Einstein" and very good > salaries. The Royal Society should also be taken to court some day. Magueijo and his accomplice Paul Davies have a Teacher called John Moffat who has just proved bigger than the sum of Newton and Einstein: http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/physik_astronomie/bericht-93654.html This John Moffat is known in Einstein criminal cult as the author of "The Most Efficient Red Herring". He has discovered that the speed of light is VARIABLE and so any need for herecy in Einstein zombie world is satisfied: the speed of light is not 300000km/s although Einstein says so, Einstein's theory may be refuted, Einstein's theory may be revised, Einstein's theory may be improved, who says there are no new Einsteins etc. And what is most important, any time a heretic tries to advance the idea of a variable speed of light, Einstein zombie world replies: "Variable speed of light? Moffat? Magueijo? But we know that - that is an old story!". Then the heretic disappears while Einstein zombie world starts singing "Divine Einstein" even more fiercely. However hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult know that Moffat- Magueijo's variability of the speed of light has nothing to do with Einstein's 1905 false light postulate so in fact Moffat-Magueijo's "theory" is perfect camouflage that makes Einstein's idiocies eternal. For that reason Moffat and Magueijo have the greatest salaries in the Perimeter Institute - a subdivision of the Ministry of Silly Walks (Einstein Criminal Cult): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w Moffat should also be taken to court some day. Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1193410157.170808.303390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1193227426.587445.251080@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1193292024.014553.143180@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd55411afde9e761 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd55411afde9e761 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,dd55411afde9e761 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd55411afde9e761 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,dd55411afde9e761 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: SHOULD EINSTEINIANS BE BROUGHT TO COURT? Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:49:17 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 83 Message-ID: <1193410157.170808.303390@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> References: <1193227426.587445.251080@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1193292024.014553.143180@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193410157 12971 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2007 14:49:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1193292024.014553.143180@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.159; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0