🚀 go-pugleaf

On 22 Oct, 22:00, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 12:51 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/universe/
> > Sycophant: "Welcome to the webpage of a Brian Greene's bestseller "The
> > Elegant Universe"....String theory, as it is often called, is the key
> > to the unified FIELD theory that eluded Einstein for more than thirty
> > years......String theory, as the author vividly describes, reveals a
> > vision of the universe that is sending shock waves through the world
> > of physics. Thrilling and revolutionary ideas such as new dimensions
> > hidden within the fabric of space, black holes transmuting into
> > elementary particles, rips and punctures in the SPACE-TIME
> > CONTINUUM...."
>
> >http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/einstein07/einstein07_index.html
> > Brian Greene: "So the question I have is, we, many of us, are working
> > on Einstein's legacy in a sense, which is trying to find the unified
> > theory that he looked for such a long time and never found, and we've
> > been pursuing an approach called super string theory for many years
> > now. And it is a completely theoretical undertaking. It is completely
> > mathematical. It has yet to make contact with experimental data. I
> > would like to ask Einstein what he would think of this approach to
> > unification. Does he see the same kind of beauty, the same kind of
> > elegance, the same kind of powerful incisive ideas in this framework
> > to give him the confidence that he had in the general theory of
> > relativity?"
>
> >http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a...
> > Albert Einstein (1954): "I consider it entirely possible that physics
> > cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous
> > structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air,
> > including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of
> > contemporary physics."
>
> > Pentcho Valev
>
> I can only hope that Brian Greene is not waiting for a reply.
>
> I ask why do dumb F***s posts this infantile crap in a physics
> newsgroup, since it becomes obvious that the majority of posters have
> never cracked a textbook on the subject?
>
> Hope you can explain that one to me, and yes, I am a graduate
> physicist after spending 5 years in undgraduate study, working through
> all of the assigned problem sets, suffering through all of the all
> night cram sessions, and finally passign all of the exams.
>
> Physics is pretty logical, and if you carefully learn the basics in
> Physics 101, and follow through for the next 6 or so years of intense
> study, you willl eventually have acquied sufficent knowledge to
> pontifiate on the subject, and possilblh be even in a position to
> dispute their ideas.  Until you reach this level of knowledge, it is a
> rather good idea for everyone else to sit back, crack their textbooks,
> and keep their pie holes closed.
>
> Too much crackpot, ignorant crap is today being posted on sci.physics.
> It's time to slam the door in the face these ignorant assholes who
> post this nonsense!
>
> Harry C.

That would necessitate a moderation system on sci.physics, which isn't
going to happen. Thus the schizophrenics will continue to scoff,
bullshit and smear anyone in the way of their damaged worldview.

Pentcho is never going to stop since he simply lurves the attention he
gets. He probably gets an erection while at the keyboard, who knows?

"Professor" Androcles of Hogwarts, Traveler (Louis Savain) and "Dr"
Henri Wilson and other deranged idiots will continue to drool into
their keyboards until those nice men in white coats come to take them
away. Then they'll be replaced by the next generation of borderline
mental patients.

You can either get mad about all of this, or try to derive
entertainment in the way that Dirk van der Moertel does.