🚀 go-pugleaf

<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:1193086842.073858.294680@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: On Oct 22, 12:51 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
: > http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~motl/universe/
: > Sycophant: "Welcome to the webpage of a Brian Greene's bestseller "The
: > Elegant Universe"....String theory, as it is often called, is the key
: > to the unified FIELD theory that eluded Einstein for more than thirty
: > years......String theory, as the author vividly describes, reveals a
: > vision of the universe that is sending shock waves through the world
: > of physics. Thrilling and revolutionary ideas such as new dimensions
: > hidden within the fabric of space, black holes transmuting into
: > elementary particles, rips and punctures in the SPACE-TIME
: > CONTINUUM...."
: >
: > http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/einstein07/einstein07_index.html
: > Brian Greene: "So the question I have is, we, many of us, are working
: > on Einstein's legacy in a sense, which is trying to find the unified
: > theory that he looked for such a long time and never found, and we've
: > been pursuing an approach called super string theory for many years
: > now. And it is a completely theoretical undertaking. It is completely
: > mathematical. It has yet to make contact with experimental data. I
: > would like to ask Einstein what he would think of this approach to
: > unification. Does he see the same kind of beauty, the same kind of
: > elegance, the same kind of powerful incisive ideas in this framework
: > to give him the confidence that he had in the general theory of
: > relativity?"
: >
: > http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a...
: > Albert Einstein (1954): "I consider it entirely possible that physics
: > cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous
: > structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air,
: > including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of
: > contemporary physics."
: >
: > Pentcho Valev
:
: I can only hope that Brian Greene is not waiting for a reply.
:
: I ask why do dumb F***s posts this infantile crap in a physics
: newsgroup, since it becomes obvious that the majority of posters have
: never cracked a textbook on the subject?
:
: Hope you can explain that one to me, and yes, I am a graduate
: physicist after spending 5 years in undgraduate study, working through
: all of the assigned problem sets, suffering through all of the all
: night cram sessions, and finally passign all of the exams.
:
: Physics is pretty logical, and if you carefully learn the basics in
: Physics 101, and follow through for the next 6 or so years of intense
: study, you willl eventually have acquied sufficent knowledge to
: pontifiate on the subject, and possilblh be even in a position to
: dispute their ideas.  Until you reach this level of knowledge, it is a
: rather good idea for everyone else to sit back, crack their textbooks,
: and keep their pie holes closed.
:
: Too much crackpot, ignorant crap is today being posted on sci.physics.
: It's time to slam the door in the face these ignorant assholes who
: post this nonsense!
:
: Harry C.
img76 says you can't use img22 to derive img76.
img22 is catch 22.
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif
DUMBFUCK!
It's time to slam the door in the face these ignorant arseholes who
post this nonsense!