🚀 go-pugleaf

On 23 Oct, 01:38, "Ben Bean" <kavs_scrapth...@sysmatrix.net> wrote:
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult have already adopted Newton's
> > emission theory: they can imagine fast photons, slow photons etc. Now
> > they are going to abandon Einstein's relativity but do not seem to be
> > very sad or frightened and even demonstrate their relativistic humour:
>
> >http://www.universetoday.com/2007/10/03/high-energy-gamma-rays-go-slo...
> > "The speed of light is the speed of light, and that's that. Right?
> > Well, maybe not. Try and figure this out. Astronomers studying
> > radiation coming from a distant galaxy found that the high energy
> > gamma rays arrived a few minutes after the lower-energy photons, even
> > though they were emitted at the same time. If true, this result would
> > overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which says that all photons
> > should move at the speed of light. Uh oh Einstein."
>
> > Pentcho Valev
>
> It's well-known that higher energy photons have greater likelihood of
> interacting with matter. Maybe that explains it -- all the absorbtions and
> re-emissions between here and there. Maybe the high energy rays are
> actually emitted later but this is yet to be plumbed with precision. No,
> this news does nothing to "overturn Einstein's theory".

Nothing can overturn Einstein's "theory" in Einstein zombie world.
Much simpler experiments such as Michelson-Morley, Sagnac and Pound-
Rebka, which in another world would OBVIOUSLY contradict Einstein's
idiocies, have been converted by your criminal Masters into glorious
confirmations of those idiocies:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as
evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas LATER WRITERS ALMOST
UNIVERSALLY use it as support for the light postulate of special
relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE
WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT
POSTULATE."

So the point is not the experimental refutation of Einstein's
idiocies. Rather, you should have noticed the implicit, and in the
cases of John Stachel and Jean Eisenstaedt explicit, return to
NEWTON'S EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT. Your criminal Masters cannot (or
find it difficult to) extract money from Einstein's idiocies and are
trying to convert the emission theory into a new money-spinner.

Pentcho Valev