Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6283Re: SOUFFLE OF PARTICLES WITH GRAVITY
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28
46 lines
4275 bytes
4275 bytes
http://www.american.com/archive/2007/april-0407/the-man-who-made-our-world "In 1905, Einstein wrote his five famous papers. In the first of these, the only one he himself called "revolutionary", Einstein proposed that light consisted not of continuous waves, as had been thought since the rejection of Newton's particle theory, but rather of tiny bundles called quanta.....In his 1905 papers, Einstein actually used two apparently contradictory interpretations of the nature of light. In the paper on light quanta, Einstein had argued forcefully for the return to Newton's particulate conception of light. Yet in the same year, in his development of special relativity, Einstein had rejected a particulate emission theory of light and had used the traditional Maxwell wave theory. This striking ability to juggle two viewpoints apparently at odds was characteristic of Einstein's thought...." http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/homepage/cv.html#forthcoming "Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity and the Problems in the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies that Led him to it." in Cambridge Companion to Einstein, M. Janssen and C. Lehner, eds., Cambridge University Press. Preprint. John Norton: "Einstein could not see how to formulate a fully relativistic electrodynamics merely using his new device of field transformations. So he considered the possibility of modifying Maxwell's electrodynamics in order to bring it into accord with an emission theory of light, such as Newton had originally conceived. There was some inevitability in these attempts, as long as he held to classical (Galilean) kinematics. Imagine that some emitter sends out a light beam at c. According to this kinematics, an observer who moves past at v in the opposite direction, will see the emitter moving at v and the light emitted at c+v. This last fact is the defining characteristic of an emission theory of light: the velocity of the emitter is added vectorially to the velocity of light emitted....If an emission theory can be formulated as a field theory, it would seem to be unable to determine the future course of processes from their state in the present. As long as Einstein expected a viable theory of light, electricity and magnetism to be a field theory, these sorts of objections would render an emission theory of light inadmissible." http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a09145525ca.pdf Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics." Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1192631334.673554.27130@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1192169805.783796.61450@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,727fde6d79fb7517 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,727fde6d79fb7517 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,727fde6d79fb7517 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,727fde6d79fb7517 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,727fde6d79fb7517 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: SOUFFLE OF PARTICLES WITH GRAVITY Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 07:28:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 48 Message-ID: <1192631334.673554.27130@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com> References: <1192169805.783796.61450@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.168 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1192631335 17638 127.0.0.1 (17 Oct 2007 14:28:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:55 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1192169805.783796.61450@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.168; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0