Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6313Re: Difference between physics and mathematics
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:01
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:01
46 lines
4207 bytes
4207 bytes
On 13 Oct, 08:37, Paul Le Bourdais <plebourd...@vif.com> wrote: > On 13 oct, 02:03, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Provided you know where the predictions come from Roberts Roberts. For > > instance, initially, Albert the Juggler (or Albert the Plagiarist) may > > deduce a few miracles (time dilation, length contraction etc.) from > > the false light postulate: > > > Pentcho Valev > > Come on Pentcho, faudrait pas blamer Einstein pour l'idolatrie qui > s'est developpee autour de lui. Personnellement, bien qu'etant > physicien de formation et amoureux fou de la physique et plus > generalement de la comprehension de notre monde, je pense maintenant > que l'_interpretation_ qui est faite des equations associees a la RR > et a la RG sont erronnees (et il n'y a aucun doute dans mon esprit > qu'Einstein penserait probablement la meme chose; m'evidemment > certains demanderont pour qui je me prends en pretendant dire ce > qu'Einstein aurait pense: ces personnes n'ont rien compris d'Einstein > et surtout rien compris du monde de la connaissance qui n'a rien a > voir avec les conduites suburbaines dans lesquelles certains semblent > vouloir l'entrainer). > > En resume, je t'en prie, ne buche pas sur l'idole, Pentcho, mais bien > sur les idolatres ;-) L'idole n'est pas innocent, Paul. Il a deliberement masque les consequences fatales de la variabilite de la vitesse de la lumiere: http://www.bartleby.com/173/22.html Albert Einstein, 1920: "In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we might think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of relativity and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in the dust. But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude that the special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain of validity; its result hold only so long as we are able to disregard the influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena (e.g. of light)." Pentcho Valev
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1192258918.057152.151130@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191952780.146772.75680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <F6UOi.7516$H22.3477@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <w5ednTQwhvcGiJDanZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@wavecable.com> <7ZTPi.2996$lD6.1305@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <1192255436.130990.306950@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1192257432.395352.25830@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,fbabe5f5b7edad1e X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a6cbf69709d02d18 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a6cbf69709d02d18 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,a6cbf69709d02d18 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,a6cbf69709d02d18 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: FRENCH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths Subject: Re: Difference between physics and mathematics Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:01:58 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 47 Message-ID: <1192258918.057152.151130@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <1191952780.146772.75680@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <F6UOi.7516$H22.3477@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <w5ednTQwhvcGiJDanZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@wavecable.com> <7ZTPi.2996$lD6.1305@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <1192255436.130990.306950@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <1192257432.395352.25830@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.160 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1192258918 3648 127.0.0.1 (13 Oct 2007 07:01:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:01:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1192257432.395352.25830@e9g2000prf.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.160; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0