🚀 go-pugleaf

"Darwin123" <drosen0000@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:aada141f-8d70-46f6-8515-4a96b725c1a1@q8g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 1:23 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ETHERISTS:
>
> http://www.eng.uwi.tt/depts/elec/staff/sgift/special_relativity.pdf
> The Invalidation of a Sacred Principle of Modern Physics
> Stephan J.G. Gift
> "The principle underpinning modern physics, which states that the
> speed of light is
> constant and independent of the motion of the source and the observer,
> is shown
> to be invalid. (...) For a stationary observer O, the stationary light
> source S emits light at speed c, wavelength Lo, and frequency Fo given
> by Fo=c/Lo. If the observer moves toward S at speed v, then again
> based on classical analysis, the speed of light relative to the moving
> observer is (c + v) and not c as required by Einstein's law of light
> propagation. Hence the observer intercepts wave-fronts of light at a
> frequency fA, which is higher than Fo, as is observed, and is given by
> fA = (c+v)/Lo > Fo. (...) In light of this elementary result
> invalidating STR, it is difficult to understand why this invalid
> theory has been (and continues to be) accepted for the past 100 years.
> It is time to reject STR with its incorrect light speed invariance
> principle long pointed out by Ives, and return to the Lorentz-Maxwell
> ether-based theory elucidated by Ives and summarized by Erlichson."
>
    Ives was wrong. He made a prediction about circular optical
cavities. I chapters in a book he wrote about relativity. I
immediately found several errors.
=================================================

    Einstein was wrong. He made a prediction about time dilation.
I chapters in a paper he wrote about relativity. I
immediately found several errors.