🚀 go-pugleaf

"harald" <hvan@swissonline.ch> wrote in message
news:2248c2a5-6366-4816-a334-b32b537c1ba7@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 4, 1:45 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_u> wrote:
> "harald" <h...@swissonline.ch> wrote in message
>
> news:50a20a69-e85b-4280-b890-91d50885690c@q21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 4, 7:47 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > For a century human rationality has been procrusteanized into
> > conformity with Einstein's idea that, for a non-rotating observer, the
> > periphery of a rotating disk is LONGER than the periphery of a non-
> > rotating disk:
>
> Wrong.
> - A. Lorentz, Nature Feb.17 1921, p.793+
> ==============================================
> A. Lorentz isn't Einstein, you lying cretin, and neither is H. A. Lorentz.

Indifferently of what Einstein may have meant, 1921 - 1905 < 100.
But I stand corrected, I had omitted the H!

Harald
=================================================
Still wrong. "Indifferently of" what Van Lintel may have meant,
Einstein's 1/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) is greater than Lorentz's sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).

In Idiot Einstein's world, the  periphery of a rotating disk is LONGER than
the periphery of a non-rotating disk, as Pentcho Valev correctly states.

Read the paper.
� 4. Physical Meaning of the Equations Obtained in Respect to Moving Rigid
Bodies and Moving Clocks
"We envisage a rigid sphere of radius R, at rest relatively to the moving
system k, and with its centre at the origin of co-ordinates of k. The
equation of the surface of this sphere moving relatively to the system K
with velocity v is
xi^2 + eta^2 + zeta^2 = R^2 (Eqn 1)
The equation of this surface expressed in x, y, z at the time t=0 is
x^2/(1-v^2/c^2) + eta^2 + zeta^2 = R^2 (Eqn 2) "

Subtracting Eqn 2 from Eqn 1,
xi^2 - x^2/(1-v^2/c^2) = 0
xi^2 =  x^2/(1-v^2/c^2)

That is, the MOVING xi (at rest in the moving system k) is GREATER than the
stationary x.

"A rigid body which, measured in a state of rest, has the form of a sphere,
therefore has in a state of motion--viewed from the stationary system--the
form of an ellipsoid of revolution with the axes

   R * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), R, R."

 "A rigid body which, measured in a state of rest, has the form of a
sphere,"

but it was "a rigid sphere of radius R" when it was MOVING!

 A length that was x when stationary and xi when moving has become equal to
R and R= x is less than xi when the "sphere" STOPS.

"Thus, whereas the Y and Z dimensions of the sphere (and therefore of every
rigid body of no matter what form) do not appear modified by the motion, the
X dimension appears shortened"  (NO, LENGTHENED!) "in the ratio 1:
sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) , i.e. the greater the value of v, the greater the 
shortening
 (LENGTHENING)" .

The sphere is just a smokescreen, as is the ratio 1: sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).
The lying bastard was a con-artist and a charlatan.