🚀 go-pugleaf

Einsteinians are champions in cramming maximum absurdity and lie into
minimum volume of text:

http://www.physorg.com/news190027752.html
"(PhysOrg.com) -- The phenomenon of time dilation is a strange yet
experimentally confirmed effect of relativity theory. One of its
implications is that events occurring in distant parts of the universe
should appear to occur more slowly than events located closer to us.
For example, when observing supernovae, scientists have found that
distant explosions seem to fade more slowly than the quickly-fading
nearby supernovae. The effect can be explained because (1) the speed
of light is a constant (independent of how fast a light source is
moving toward or away from an observer) and (2) the universe is
expanding at an accelerating rate, which causes light from distant
objects to redshift (i.e. the wavelengths to become longer) in
relation to how far away the objects are from observers on Earth."

Pentcho Valev wrote:

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indian-US-scientists-question-Big-Bang-theory/H1-Article1-527242.aspx
"An Indian and an American scientist have questioned the Big Bang
theory, saying it does not serve as a viable explanation for the
origin of the universe. The research papers of Ashwini Kumar Lal of
India's Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation and Rhawn
Joseph of Northern California's Brain Research Laboratory have been
accepted for publication in the April issue of the peer-reviewed
Harvard journal, Journal of Cosmology. The research papers come even
as scientists at Geneva's European Organization for Nuclear Research
(CERN) are in the midst of experiments on the Large Hadron Collider
(LHC) recreating conditions of the beginning of the universe. "The two
scientific papers cast shadows of suspicion over the efficacy of the
Big Bang model. The scientific community may have to ponder afresh
over the issue relating to the origin of the universe," Lal told IANS
in New Delhi. He also noted that CERN scientists "are trying to jigsaw
a theory which fits the conditions of the Big Bang model". "The Big
Bang is said to have occurred 13.75 billion years. But there is
evidence, as I have written in my paper, that there were fully formed
distant galaxies that must have already been billions of years old at
the time," he added. In his paper "Big Bang? A Critical Review", Lal
says: "There is a growing body of evidence which demonstrates the
Universe could not have begun with a Big Bang 13.75 billion years ago.
"Indeed, the day may come when it is determined there never was a Big
Bang and cosmologists of the future will only gaze back in wonder at
how anyone could have believed in a creation event which was refuted
by so much contradictory evidence," he adds."

Bravo, Einsteinians! The Big Bang money-spinner is getting too
schizophrenic and dangerous (although we all live in Einsteiniana's
schizophrenic world) so now it is time for you to extract more career
and money from the "growing body of evidence which demonstrates the
Universe could not have begun with a Big Bang 13.75 billion years
ago".

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com