🚀 go-pugleaf

Whoever wrote:

> "Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message 
> news:v1bv5518gnic5melr2l3s20s27qqshm992@4ax.com...
> 
>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:12:54 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:5b0cf384-aeb7-4698-85f8-a1d15761bbf2@h21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... 
>>>
>>>
>>>> Lies:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.newsweek.com/id/204892
>>>> "In their namesake experiment, Albert Michelson (a physicist who won
>>>> the Nobel Prize in 1907) and Edward Morley (a chemist) showed that the
>>>> speed of light is always the same (now known to be 186,282 miles per
>>>> second) relative to stationary observers as well as moving ones.
>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a valid summary .. their experiment is consistent with that
>>> conclusion, but it did not show that that was the only explanation.  
>>> What it
>>> did rule out was an absolute fixed ether.
>>>
>>>> Nothing but light has this property: if you are approaching a car
>>>> that's moving 30 miles per hour, and you're moving 30mph as well, the
>>>> approaching car appears to be coming at you at 60 mph. Not so with
>>>> light. If you are traveling at the speed of light, designated c,
>>>> toward a light beam moving directly toward you, it appears to be
>>>> approaching at c, not 2c."
>>>>
>>>> Truth:
>>>>
>>>> In their namesake experiment, Albert Michelson (a physicist who won
>>>> the Nobel Prize in 1907) and Edward Morley (a chemist) showed (without
>>>> knowing it) that the speed of light varies with the speed of the light
>>>> source v in accordance with the equation c'=c+v given by Newton's
>>>> emission theory of light.
>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a valid summary .. their experiment is consistent with that
>>> conclusion, but it did not show that that was the only explanation.  
>>> What it
>>> did rule out was an absolute fixed ether.
>>>
>>>> If you are approaching a car that's moving
>>>> 30 miles per hour, and you're moving 30mph as well, the approaching
>>>> car appears to be coming at you at 60 mph. So with light. If you are
>>>> traveling at the speed of light, designated c where c is the speed of
>>>> light relative to the light source, toward a light beam moving
>>>> directly toward you, it appears to be approaching at 2c.
>>>
>>>
>>> Shame that that is refuted by Sagnac.
>>
>>
>> Sagnac fully supports BaTh.
> 
> 
> Stop lying Henry
> 
>> It plainly refutes SR
> 
> 
> Stop lying Henry

Henry (who even lies about his name--it is Ralph) thinks
that lying is a way to make your point. He knows nothing of
science.
> 
>> because its analysis requires
>> that the rays move at c+v and c-v wrt the source.
> 
> 
> You don't understand the anlaysis .. and you get yours totally wrong

That is why he has to lie all the time.
> 
>> If you cannot understand simple diagrams that is not my fault.
> 
> 
> It is your fault that you don't understand,, because it has been 
> explained to you countless times
> 
> Stop lying Henry .. and a fraudster deliberately trying to fool people 
> into believing your theory is correct.  Get over it .. you're flogging a 
> dead horse.

Ralph lives in a delusional world where he tells himself he is
a scientist instead of the clueless fool he actually is.

> 
>