🚀 go-pugleaf

"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message 
news:n8e06593v20oarrhtmodv4bd6quj18m6is@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:52:35 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>>news:143065ptd6hndvnojkif3nrmva802mpmtd@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:12:41 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message
>>>>news:v1bv5518gnic5melr2l3s20s27qqshm992@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:12:54 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Shame that that is refuted by Sagnac.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sagnac fully supports BaTh.
>>>>
>>>>Stop lying Henry
>>>>
>>>>> It plainly refutes SR
>>>>
>>>>Stop lying Henry
>>>>
>>>>> because its analysis requires
>>>>> that the rays move at c+v and c-v wrt the source.
>>>>
>>>>You don't understand the anlaysis .. and you get yours totally wrong
>>>>
>>>>> If you cannot understand simple diagrams that is not my fault.
>>>>
>>>>It is your fault that you don't understand,, because it has been 
>>>>explained
>>>>to you countless times
>>>>
>>>>Stop lying Henry .. and a fraudster deliberately trying to fool people
>>>>into
>>>>believing your theory is correct.  Get over it .. you're flogging a dead
>>>>horse.
>>>
>>> You obviously know nothing about SR.
>>
>>Stop lying Henry
>>
>>> According to SR, the rays move at c+v and c-v wrt the source.
>>
>>Yeup
>>
>>> Have a look at the SR analysis.
>>
>>I have .. you obviously don't understand it, or you would not be making
>>false claims about it.  Well. if you were an honest person you wouldn't.
>>However, it is well known that you are a liar.
>>
>>> How does that happen?
>>
>>I've explained it to you before, more than once, as have others.  You'll
>>only lie about it if I explain it again.
>
> So you agree that the rays move at c+v and c-v wrt the source.

The speed of separation of the light from the source, as seen from the 
non-rotating frame of reference, is c+v and c-v.  That is what SR says 
happens.  This has been explained to you countless times.  You're just a sad 
little lying troll.  Truly pathetic.