Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6363Re: DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:07
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:07
120 lines
8974 bytes
8974 bytes
> http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen > George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two > contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both > of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories > must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with > reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself > that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it > would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to > be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and > hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since > the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while > retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To > tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any > fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary > again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, > to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take > account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably > necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to > exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is > tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this > knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead > of the truth." Triplethink in Einsteiniana: The speed of light does not vary with the gravitational potential. The speed of light varies with the gravitational potential V in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation c'=c(1+V/c^2). The speed of light varies with the gravitational potential V in accordance with Einstein's 1915 equation c'=c(1+2V/ c^2): http://www.astronomynotes.com/relativity/s4.htm "Prediction: light escaping from a large mass should lose energy---the wavelength must increase since the speed of light is constant. Stronger surface gravity produces a greater increase in the wavelength. This is a consequence of time dilation. Suppose person A on the massive object decides to send light of a specific frequency f to person B all of the time. So every second, f wave crests leave person A. The same wave crests are received by person B in an interval of time interval of (1+z) seconds. He receives the waves at a frequency of f/(1+z). Remember that the speed of light c = (the frequency f) (the wavelength L). If the frequency is reduced by (1+z) times, the wavelength must INcrease by (1+z) times: L_atB = (1+z) L_atA. In the doppler effect, this lengthening of the wavelength is called a redshift. For gravity, the effect is called a gravitational redshift." http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_sp_gr.html "Is light affected by gravity? If so, how can the speed of light be constant? Wouldn't the light coming off of the Sun be slower than the light we make here? If not, why doesn't light escape a black hole? Yes, light is affected by gravity, but not in its speed. General Relativity (our best guess as to how the Universe works) gives two effects of gravity on light. It can bend light (which includes effects such as gravitational lensing), and it can change the energy of light. But it changes the energy by shifting the frequency of the light (gravitational redshift) not by changing light speed. Gravity bends light by warping space so that what the light beam sees as "straight" is not straight to an outside observer. The speed of light is still constant." Dr. Eric Christian http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm "So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is not constant in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99 of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is, c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 ) where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light c0 is measured." http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s6-01/6-01.htm "In geometrical units we define c_0 = 1, so Einstein's 1911 formula can be written simply as c=1+phi. However, this formula for the speed of light (not to mention this whole approach to gravity) turned out to be incorrect, as Einstein realized during the years leading up to 1915 and the completion of the general theory. In fact, the general theory of relativity doesn't give any equation for the speed of light at a particular location, because the effect of gravity cannot be represented by a simple scalar field of c values. Instead, the "speed of light" at a each point depends on the direction of the light ray through that point, as well as on the choice of coordinate systems, so we can't generally talk about the value of c at a given point in a non- vanishing gravitational field. However, if we consider just radial light rays near a spherically symmetrical (and non- rotating) mass, and if we agree to use a specific set of coordinates, namely those in which the metric coefficients are independent of t, then we can read a formula analogous to Einstein's 1911 formula directly from the Schwarzschild metric. (...) In the Newtonian limit the classical gravitational potential at a distance r from mass m is phi=-m/r, so if we let c_r = dr/dt denote the radial speed of light in Schwarzschild coordinates, we have c_r =1+2phi, which corresponds to Einstein's 1911 equation, except that we have a factor of 2 instead of 1 on the potential term." http://www.speed-light.info/speed_of_light_variable.htm "Einstein wrote this paper in 1911 in German (download from: http://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/annalen/history/einstein-papers/1911_35_898-908.pdf). It predated the full formal development of general relativity by about four years. You can find an English translation of this paper in the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity' beginning on page 99; you will find in section 3 of that paper Einstein's derivation of the variable speed of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is: c'=c0(1+phi/c^2) where phi is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the speed of light co is measured......You can find a more sophisticated derivation later by Einstein (1955) from the full theory of general relativity in the weak field approximation....For the 1955 results but not in coordinates see page 93, eqn (6.28): c(r)=[1+2phi(r)/c^2]c. Namely the 1955 approximation shows a variation in km/sec twice as much as first predicted in 1911." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ecdf40d7-ebb4-4b54-b153-39cba723bacb@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<56ddf5a4-59ad-4025-992b-60d3cae136b2@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4a3933c5-7fad-4b56-aaed-c7f563a69820@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <953263b2-8998-4076-a09d-b3eab195f072@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <7487f490-b668-41c9-93ba-bd9ebbaa97af@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <ce6e1e33-dc61-4347-b29f-80ab0dacfe4f@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <06257615-5a59-4e15-9f3c-f8afd59c8c7b@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <0075a22f$0$9675$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,5b561f690f78979f X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 120 Message-ID: <ecdf40d7-ebb4-4b54-b153-39cba723bacb@p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> References: <56ddf5a4-59ad-4025-992b-60d3cae136b2@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4a3933c5-7fad-4b56-aaed-c7f563a69820@z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <953263b2-8998-4076-a09d-b3eab195f072@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <7487f490-b668-41c9-93ba-bd9ebbaa97af@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <ce6e1e33-dc61-4347-b29f-80ab0dacfe4f@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <06257615-5a59-4e15-9f3c-f8afd59c8c7b@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <0075a22f$0$9675$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.207.46 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247483241 31685 127.0.0.1 (13 Jul 2009 11:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p23g2000vbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.207.46; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; GTB6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)