🚀 go-pugleaf

"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
Poster "2+2=5" <two@.....> wrote in sci.physics.relativity:
I have been reading messages in this group for some time now, hoping to
learn about relativity. All the texts I have read are based on vague and
sometimes unrealistic assumptions and are very hard to follow, so I need
help.
It appears that the theory is still very controversial and that most
contibutors here don't think it is correct. Certainly those who support it
rarely even try to defend it intelligently but simply resort to ridiculing
anyone who doesn't accept it.
>>
From what I have read, there are clearly more sound arguments against
Einstein's theory than there are for it. It seems little different from
Lorentz's ether theory.
>>
Maybe there is a medium that carries light waves just as Maxwell predicted.
> 
 Pentcho Valev wrote:
See this:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/e57ef431c2a3dc05
THE WAVE MODEL OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA
> 
hanson wrote:
Pentcho, even better would be for the poster "2+2=5" simply
to learn by reading the Torah, Bible or the Koran. It contains
the same basic fabulations that you have to take on FAITH.
>
Tell the poster that Einstein himself refuted his own theory in 
1954, in a  letter to Besso,  just a year before Albert folded his 
relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket & finally 
puffed,  Einstein wrote: 
>
::AE:: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based 
::AE:: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that 
::AE:: case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, [my] 
::AE:: gravitation theory included."             --- Alberts Einstein 
>
Einstein's final take is reflected in the real world where one can 
see  by 4 simple lines where they laugh about Einstein's shit 
and where they still hang onto it, like: 
>
= mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit" 
= *.edu and grantology ...................."does use REL,  No shit" 
= Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload" 
= Jews defend it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not". 
>
So why even "learn" Rel-shit unless he is fishing for a grant which 
I doubt that the poster is in a position in to do so.... But if he gets  
into Rel-shit he will be able to post into ***arxiv.org *** which is
epitomized and  characterized by this post here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5539 
which appears to be intellectually arresting to Einstein's Dingleberries:
::: Schrodinger's cat versus Darwin  -- by author: Z.K. Silagadze
::: Sun Wu-k'ung, an immortal Monkey-King of Chaos learns modern 
::: physics from the Patriarch Bodhi and questions the Darwinian 
::: evolution. He finds that the modern physics indicates towards the 
::: intelligent design as a vastly more probably origin of humans than 
::: the random evolution by mutations and natural selection.
::: Comments:  52 pages, 18 figures.
>
Thanks for the laughs... hahahaha...ahahahanson