Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6397Re: RELATIVITY AS INCONSISTENCY
From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:37
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:37
39 lines
2795 bytes
2795 bytes
Should be anything the army touches a dead Simply is the army goal along anything dead -- Ahmed Ouahi, Architect Bonjour! "Juan R. Gonz�lez-�lvarez" <juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com> kirjoitti viestiss�:pan.2009.07.02.10.58.25@canonicalscience.com... > Pentcho Valev wrote on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:39:57 -0700: > >> http://labnews.co.uk/laboratory_article.php/4514/2/2/attack-on-great- > pillar-of-physics >> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent, its supporters >> have drawn on contradictory principles in a way that greatly expanded >> their apparent ability to explain the universe. Most crazes die out when >> it becomes obvious that they were overblown. The amazing thing about >> Einstein's theory of relativity is that it has kept going. It is built >> on contradictions, but these very contradictions means that almost >> anything 'proves' that it is right. It is a bit like a theory where you >> say 1 + 1 = 2, but also that 1+ 1 = 3." >> >> Pentcho Valev >> pvalev@yahoo.com > > From the news: > > "Perhaps tellingly Dr Peter Hayes is senior lecturer in politics - not > physics. In his latest paper he argues that Albert Einstein's theory of > relativity - perhaps the most famous scientific theory in history - > should be viewed as an ideology, not as a science. He argues that its > impact on popular culture and science has been so influential precisely > because as a scientific theory it doesn't actually make sense." > > > > -- > http://www.canonicalscience.org/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cC33m.19539$vi5.11658@uutiset.elisa.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed1.swip.net!newsfeed1.funet.fi!newsfeeds.funet.fi!nntp.inet.fi!inet.fi!feeder1.news.saunalahti.fi!uutiset.elisa.fi!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<7f709a90-b8c3-427d-bdc7-72e19eff6287@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <pan.2009.07.02.10.58.25@canonicalscience.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,bab47845d70a08d1 X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed1.swip.net!newsfeed1.funet.fi!newsfeeds.funet.fi!nntp.inet.fi!inet.fi!feeder1.news.saunalahti.fi!uutiset.elisa.fi!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ouahi@welho.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.physique References: <7f709a90-b8c3-427d-bdc7-72e19eff6287@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <pan.2009.07.02.10.58.25@canonicalscience.com> Subject: Re: RELATIVITY AS INCONSISTENCY Lines: 41 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <cC33m.19539$vi5.11658@uutiset.elisa.fi> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 17:37:00 +0300 NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.78.160.81 X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@saunalahti.com X-Trace: uutiset.elisa.fi 1246545416 62.78.160.81 (Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:36:56 EEST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:36:56 EEST Organization: Elisa Customer