🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jun 20, 9:00 pm, "Whoever" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> <kens...@erinet.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > No there is no wavelength shift. The wavelength of an elementary
> > source such as sodium is a universal constant of 589 nm. That means
> > that all observer measures his sodium source to have a wavelength of
> > 589 nm.
>
> But we see a shift in wavelength .. that is shown experimentally .. you have
> of red shift, yes?  red shift is a shift in WAVELENGTH as measured by
> the observer.
>
> Wavelength goes up, frequency goes down, light speed is constant.
>
> You are so very adept at aiding others in showing yourself to be wrong.

hey idiot.....the incoming sodium light becomes a new light source in
the grating's frame and the grating defines a new wavelength for this
new light source. The spectrum pattern of this new light source (but
it is not sodium)can be used to determine the original source of the
incoming light. Once it is determined to be sodium you must use the
universal wavelength of sodium (589 nm) to determine the speed of
incoming sodium light as follows:
c' = (measured frequency of incoming sodium light)(universal
wavelength of sodium 589 nm)
The wavelength of sodium light never change during transit. Think
about it....if a sodium source move towards an observer the incoming
sodium light the grating defines a shorter wavelength than 589 nm for
this new light source and when the same sodium source moves pass the
observer, the grating defines a longer wavelength than 589 nm for the
same sodium source. Is there no limit to you SRians' stupidity to make
such absurd assertion?

Ken Seto