🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:56:52 -0700 (PDT), "kenseto@erinet.com"
<kenseto@erinet.com> wrote:

>On Jun 20, 9:00�pm, "Whoever" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> <kens...@erinet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > No there is no wavelength shift. The wavelength of an elementary
>> > source such as sodium is a universal constant of 589 nm. That means
>> > that all observer measures his sodium source to have a wavelength of
>> > 589 nm.
>>
>> But we see a shift in wavelength .. that is shown experimentally .. you have
>> of red shift, yes? �red shift is a shift in WAVELENGTH as measured by
>> the observer.
>>
>> Wavelength goes up, frequency goes down, light speed is constant.
>>
>> You are so very adept at aiding others in showing yourself to be wrong.
>
>hey idiot.....the incoming sodium light becomes a new light source in
>the grating's frame and the grating defines a new wavelength for this
>new light source. The spectrum pattern of this new light source (but
>it is not sodium)can be used to determine the original source of the
>incoming light. Once it is determined to be sodium you must use the
>universal wavelength of sodium (589 nm) to determine the speed of
>incoming sodium light as follows:
>c' = (measured frequency of incoming sodium light)(universal
>wavelength of sodium 589 nm)
>The wavelength of sodium light never change during transit. 

According to BaTh and WaSh, the INTRINSIC wavelength of a photon changes
whenever the photon experiences a speed change. This means that conventional
VDoppler wavelength shift is a true indicator of source speed relative to any
observer.

>Think
>about it....if a sodium source move towards an observer the incoming
>sodium light the grating defines a shorter wavelength than 589 nm for
>this new light source and when the same sodium source moves pass the
>observer, the grating defines a longer wavelength than 589 nm for the
>same sodium source. Is there no limit to you SRians' stupidity to make
>such absurd assertion?
>
>Ken Seto


Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

........putting Physics back into Phairyland...