Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6431Re: Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether???????
From: Whoever
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:27
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:27
43 lines
3127 bytes
3127 bytes
<kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message news:a4a2bd58-a22f-4a7f-92cf-62b8930c3fcf@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 21, 10:40 am, "Whoever" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote: >> <kens...@erinet.com> wrote in message >> >> news:c44e6e87-cd88-4b7f-9e40-2cb98619723a@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On Jun 20, 9:00 pm, "Whoever" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >> <kens...@erinet.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > No there is no wavelength shift. The wavelength of an elementary >> >> > source such as sodium is a universal constant of 589 nm. That means >> >> > that all observer measures his sodium source to have a wavelength of >> >> > 589 nm. >> >> >> But we see a shift in wavelength .. that is shown experimentally .. >> >> you >> >> have >> >> of red shift, yes? red shift is a shift in WAVELENGTH as measured by >> >> the observer. >> >> >> Wavelength goes up, frequency goes down, light speed is constant. >> >> >> You are so very adept at aiding others in showing yourself to be >> >> wrong. >> >> > hey idiot..... >> >> [snipped .. anything starting with 'hey idiot' I'm not going to read as >> it >> is obviously not addressed to me]- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > You deserved to be called an idiot for your idiotic comment: "You are > so very adept at aiding others in showing yourself to be wrong." I quite liked it. Don't you?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<005b537f$0$9713$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<m10j35tsslk5usbjm4v93dkqcck2ce7a08@4ax.com> <9tv_l.80$8r.39@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com> <91441883-bceb-4046-a9cc-e724443f6252@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <024d7818$0$30337$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <c44e6e87-cd88-4b7f-9e40-2cb98619723a@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <024e386b$0$22120$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <a4a2bd58-a22f-4a7f-92cf-62b8930c3fcf@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,b734f4db9a15ccf7 X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail From: "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique References: <m10j35tsslk5usbjm4v93dkqcck2ce7a08@4ax.com> <9tv_l.80$8r.39@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com> <91441883-bceb-4046-a9cc-e724443f6252@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <024d7818$0$30337$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <c44e6e87-cd88-4b7f-9e40-2cb98619723a@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <024e386b$0$22120$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <a4a2bd58-a22f-4a7f-92cf-62b8930c3fcf@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <a4a2bd58-a22f-4a7f-92cf-62b8930c3fcf@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether??????? Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:27:19 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206 Lines: 44 Message-ID: <005b537f$0$9713$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 8a181080.news.astraweb.com X-Trace: DXC=U6LKCY^3=86R@Y?`:@TCo5L?0kYOcDh@:^<RLG@IOJT1M]<aO8<^l@0nlLVD6ZT3V5Y>BQ9S16Di9