Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6439Re: Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether???????
From: hw Wilson DSc
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:29
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:29
42 lines
2997 bytes
2997 bytes
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:51:26 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote: >"Henry Wilson, DSc" <hw@..> wrote in message >news:2rc045905r3enrv5o8pcjvtlauobkbu5ck@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:47:40 +1000, "Whoever" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote: >> >>>> They have not. >>> >>>Yes .. they have .. you're in denial >>> >>>> Past 'refutations' have all been shown to be flawed. >>> >>>No .. they have not. Sagnac is one particular example that fails with >>>ballistic theory. >> >> >> Hahahahhahahahahhah! Have another think.... > >No need to. I've gone through the SR explanation and it is correct, there >is no self-violation in SR involved as you claim out of ignorance. I've >gone through the ballistic interpretation and it does not predict the >observed Sagnac effect. It is well known that your calculations are >incorrect because you do not understand the physics and misapply them. Are >you not surprised that you are the only person who gets the answer you do >after so many years? You think every single physicist and mathematician is >wrong? And no .. I'm not saying you're wrong JUST because everyone else is >right. You're wrong because your analysis is flawed. .....funny how it gets the right answer... >Sad .. very sad. Yes. The fact that Einstein destroyed physics is indeed very sad. >[snip nonsense] > Henry Wilson...www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm ........putting Physics back into Phairyland...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8ib145l1ke3hvmra2rva7rg6s21oiuiecp@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!pit-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <024d7818$0$30337$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <c44e6e87-cd88-4b7f-9e40-2cb98619723a@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <u1dt35l0i09skmi40v9784usslcr15sla3@4ax.com> <005ab483$0$9712$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ek30451v2s3384mppgu4ij1lm9545bpchl@4ax.com> <005c00f7$0$9756$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <2rc045905r3enrv5o8pcjvtlauobkbu5ck@4ax.com> <005c1df9$0$9680$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,b734f4db9a15ccf7 X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!pit-transit.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: hw@..(Henry Wilson, DSc) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: Source Independency of Light Speed Without an Aether??????? Reply-To: HW@.. Message-ID: <8ib145l1ke3hvmra2rva7rg6s21oiuiecp@4ax.com> References: <9507c899-3e07-4512-b489-403a281678b0@l34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <024d7818$0$30337$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <c44e6e87-cd88-4b7f-9e40-2cb98619723a@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <u1dt35l0i09skmi40v9784usslcr15sla3@4ax.com> <005ab483$0$9712$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ek30451v2s3384mppgu4ij1lm9545bpchl@4ax.com> <005c00f7$0$9756$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <2rc045905r3enrv5o8pcjvtlauobkbu5ck@4ax.com> <005c1df9$0$9680$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 42 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:29:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.179.32.181 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1245752970 124.179.32.181 (Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:29:30 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:29:30 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services