🚀 go-pugleaf

glird <glird@aol.com> wrote in message
  39752b77-ca28-4b4c-8030-6981a24000d6@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com
> On Jun 19, 3:32 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> 
> < In 1824 Sadi Carnot deduced the prototype of the second law of
> thermodynamics:  All reversible heat engines working between two fixed
> temperatures have the same efficiency; from two premises:
>  1. Perpetuum mobile of the first kind is impossible.
>  2. Heat is conserved (cannot be converted into work
>      by the heat engine).
> Then the second premise was officially declared false but the
> conclusion, the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics,
> remained gloriously true. More precisely, the glory was introduced by
> Clausius who, in 1850, managed to convince the world that the false
> premise should be forgotten and replaced by a true one:
>  2'. Heat flows spontaneously from hot to cold.
>  Theoreticians and philosophers of science have never seen any problem
> in the fact that, originally, a false premise was ESSENTIAL in the
> deduction of a true conclusion. At least they should have considered
> the following hypothesis:
>  The conclusion, the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics, is
> false as well; Clausius' 1850 ad hoc deduction was invalid. >
> 
>    The second law of thermodynamics is based on a  false premise that
> remains present. It is Clausius's 1850 deduction: Heat flows
> spontaneously from hot to cold. It should be replaced by a true one:
> 
>   As written in "The Anpheon" by G. Lebau,
> ____
> 
>  Look at some water. Believe your senses rather than what you were
> taught. Water is a fluid continuum. No empty spaces in it. 

Imbecile.
Believe your eyes rather than that what your /non/senses
teach you:
   http://images.google.be/images?&q=tunneling%20microscope

Dirk Vdm