🚀 go-pugleaf

First of all, an increasing electric charge can avoid making an oceans boil
too recently along the earth, as an accuracy along the measurements that
even were a possible, as along that matter was found that the fine structure
constant was always almost the same as at would be as follows:

alpha (z = 1.95 ) / alpha ( z = 0 ) = 0.97  +_ 0.05

However, as it has had been observed by the same meaning that a pair of an
oxygen emission lines which has appeared along the spectra as along a five
galaxies, which would also emit a waves, located along an average redshift
of 0.2, from longtime and produced as a result with no charge at all, any
time along the fine structure constant that was almost a ten times stronger,
whith it would be as follows :

alpha ( z = 0.2 ) / alpha ( z = 0 ) = 1.001 +_ 0.002

Therefore, along that matter, were the ratio would be also as follows :

alpha ( z = 0.2 ) / alpha ( z = 0 ), which is a definitely has had to be
along 0.8, all along, a definitely as a matter a fact...


-- 
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"Juan R. Gonz�lez-�lvarez" <juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com> kirjoitti 
viestiss�:pan.2009.06.19.09.36.50@canonicalscience.com...
> Pentcho Valev wrote on Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:32:50 -0700:
>
> You do not understand thermodynamics.
>
>> In 1824 Sadi Carnot deduced the prototype of the second law of
>> thermodynamics:
>>
>> All reversible heat engines working between two fixed temperatures have
>> the same efficiency.
>>
>> from two premises:
>>
>> 1. Perpetuum mobile of the first kind is impossible.
>>
>> 2. Heat is conserved (cannot be converted into work by the heat engine).
>>
>> Then the second premise was officially declared false but the
>> conclusion, the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics, remained
>> gloriously true. More precisely, the glory was introduced by Clausius
>> who, in 1850, managed to convince the world that the false premise
>> should be forgotten and replaced by a true one:
>>
>> 2'. Heat flows spontaneously from hot to cold.
>>
>> Theoreticians and philosophers of science have never seen any problem in
>> the fact that, originally, a false premise was ESSENTIAL in the
>> deduction of a true conclusion. At least they should have considered the
>> following hypothesis:
>>
>> The conclusion, the prototype of the second law of thermodynamics, is
>> false as well; Clausius' 1850 ad hoc deduction was invalid.
>>
>> Pentcho Valev
>> pvalev@yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://www.canonicalscience.org/