🚀 go-pugleaf

"Sebastian Garth" <sebastiangarth@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:b6f0a9d3-baf2-4c48-a661-62303b4a7dc4@q23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 2, 7:58 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_x> wrote:
> Previous generations have had to wade through Einstein's offensive
> drivel that sheep like you have reproduced over the last 105 years.
> Proud of that, aren't you? Eh?

You're wrong.
==============================
No I'm not, I can read algebra and you can't.
==============================
I'm rather keen to learn,
================
Then pay attention.
===============
and furthermore humble enough
to listen to the ideas of others (raised by professors of English and
Quantum Physics, as a matter of fact). Moreover, I have been reading
Einstein's papers since I was at least 13 or so, and reached my
conclusions only after *many* years of doubtful consideration,
actually. Could I be wrong? Absolutely!
======================================
Well, get used to it. You ARE wrong, I'm right and I
do not need to be humble.
======================================
 I am only human, after all.
======================================
A human that is short on intelligence. Einstein was only a
con-artist, after all, and he suckered you.
======================================
But I do have faith in my own intuition,
======================================
Your intuition is no match for rigorous mathematical proof
no matter what your blind faith in yourself is.
======================================

and I grok what I grok. I
truly believe that Einstein's ideas of equivalence are correct.
=======================================
I truly believe you truly believe in Einstein's magic nonsense,
but this isn't about faith and belief, it's about mathematical proof
(which you do not have).
=======================================
Now, you certainly are entitled to your opinion, but your motives are
to be mean-spirited and cruel, so you really can't be taken seriously.
=======================================
Now, you certainly are entitled to your bigotry, but your motives are
to be proud of your lack of understanding of algebra, proud of your
faith and belief and intuition, mean-spirited and stupid, so you
really can't be taken seriously by any mathematician or scientist.
Your mother might be proud of you.
=======================================
Sociopathic behaviour shouldn't to be rewarded or even tolerated,
honestly. It should be uprooted like an invasive weed and then burned
for good measure.
===================================
I agree, the sociopath Einstein's crap should be uprooted like an
invasive weed and then burned for good measure, along with his
stooopid faithful disciples spreading his rumours without
understanding his mischief.
If you can't respond to the algebra all your words are just so
much flotsam floating in a sea of bullshit, and you can't escape
by snipping, you moron.

 Ok, let's just recap here.
 The time for the resting object is t and the time for the moving object
 is tau.
The length for the resting object is x' and the length for the moving
object is xi.

According to SR,
 tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
 Ref:
   http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img61.gif
 and sqrt(1- <anything>) is less than 1, so tau < t.
 xi = x'/ sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
 so xi > x'.

 Why are you calling Einstein's length dilation a contraction?
 Why are you calling Einstein's time contraction a dialation, you IDIOT?

Now answer the questions if you are really keen to learn. You
won't of course, because you cannot be taken seriously and
you'd have to admit your years of error, an admission for which
you do not have the balls.