🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6556

Re: PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE DEAD?

#6556
From: Darwin123
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:44
18 lines
2411 bytes
On May 28, 1:47 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5/27/09, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in philos-l:
The fact that the fraudulent
> protective belt was almost explicit in the writings of Banesh
> Hoffmann, Einstein's apostle, makes the mystery even more painful:http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC"Relativity and
   Maybe Banesh was an idiot. Or maybe you misrepresent him because
you are an idiot.
   I don't see Einstein as particularly mysterious these days. Maybe
when relativity was first introduced it seemed like magic. Thousands
of experiments with particle accelerators and atomic clocks should
clarify the basic ideas even to most layman. Of course, there are
subtleties to his theory that are fun discussing. However, there are
subtleties to automotive repair, too.
   Maybe your polemic would impress us more if you would do a single
problem in electromagnetic theory. Preferably one involving high speed
objects. I don't think you ever designed or performed a mathematical
calculation, or even an electrical experiment, in your life |:-)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <04cf96a1-5a3e-4f51-9ac7-b5b6662ac333@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <3f757c84-5eb4-45a6-82d5-fe751ed612fb@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,cb3cb20c3f37e1f4
X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Darwin123 <drosen0000@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE DEAD?
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <04cf96a1-5a3e-4f51-9ac7-b5b6662ac333@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
References: <3f757c84-5eb4-45a6-82d5-fe751ed612fb@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.165.84.173
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243493047 19096 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2009 06:44:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:44:07 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.165.84.173; 
 posting-account=C03jXAoAAAB5gW0cBd6wQoFEj30Iwz0z
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) 
 Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)