🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 22, 2:15 am, "G. L. Bradford" <glbra...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0c7c1cbc-76de-444a-9fe2-1fca8d8bfe50@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 8:12 am, Michael Helland <mobyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 21, 10:01 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > I suspect clever cosmologists now clearly see the importance of the
> > > following question:
>
> > > Given the formula:
>
> > > frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
>
> > > is the redshift of a distant star's light due to a change in the speed
> > > of light, or is it due to a change in wavelength?
>
> > > The correct answer "redshift is due to change in the speed of light"
> > > will have to be officially adopted soon:
>
> > Indeed.
>
> > But a change in the speed of light has to be stated in a formula.
>
> > Recall that my interpretation of Hubble's Law is v = c - Hd
>
> > Where c and H are constants, v is the speed of light, and d is the
> > distance the light has traveled.
>
> Reasonable, if you ignore initial change in the speed of light in the
> gravitational field of the source.
>
> Pentcho Valev
>
> ===========================
>
>   An optical illusion. To the light its path throughout the gravitational
> field is as straight as straight can get, and at every local point of that
> constant of straight line path, that dead straight straightaway, the speed
> of light is just as constant, c.
>
>   You shouldn't vouch for optical illusions. The "optical" part is real but
> the "illusion" borne is rarely so.


My formula says that expansion is an optical illusion.

We see something funny from the light coming from very distant
galaxies, so we assume something is up with the galaxies!

It's the light that is acting funny.

Light is not the infinitely traveling absolute perfection we want to
believe it is.

It has a limited range, when Hd = c, then v = 0