🚀 go-pugleaf

"Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@comcast.net> wrote in message 
news:43e7d4aa-1475-4118-bd00-817560cc5d5e@j41g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 1, 7:23 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics_x> wrote:
>> "waldofj" <wald...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:615dc4f3-470e-486a-8a60-2630c6ed8813@n34g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Apr 1, 5:18 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > According to Maxwell's theory, (1) the speed of light is independent
>> > of the speed of the emitter but (2) it does depend on the speed of the
>> > observer:
>>
>> according to Maxwell's equations the speed of light is equal to 1/
>> sqrt(ep_0 * mu_0).
>> nowhere in his equations are ep_0 or mu_0 dependent on the speed of
>> the observer.
> ================================================
> ep_0 and mu_0 are properties of aether and like the speed of sound
> in vacuum and the Easter Bunny, they don't exist.
> Maxwell was dead when Michelson did his famous experiment.
> When the aether died its properties died with it.
> Goodbye ep_0 and mu_0.
> (You can still have ep_1, mu_1, sound in air and chocolate eggs).
> Goodbye idiot.

Ridiculous.
======================================
Yes, you are.
It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you FUCKING LYING
INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT
COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS

The gauntlet is down. Shut the fuck up and get on with it, YOU LYING COWARD.

In a simulation  "practical" means rotate faster and slow the simulated
light down so the viewer can easily see what is going on, you ignorant
arse.
This is Andersen:
    http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf
Look at figure 3:
 Read what Andersen says:
 "The beams are slightly curved because..."
But he doesn't animate it.

I've animated it.
In reality, the path lengths are accurate to the practical limits of finite
pixel size, but the velocities are not - and neither are Tusseladd's.
Mine works because I chose an exact integer wavelength in fixed frame.
 LIKE THIS, you worthless bigot:
   http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/CoriSag.gif
You and Tusseladd are frauds!

AND you ARE capable of significantly improving on it, you haven't tried
because
1) You are too fuckin' LAZY,
2) You've already made up your pathetic mind, you fuckin' BIGOT!
3) You are fuckin' stooopid,
4) You are a troll,
5) ...

I'll give Tusseladd a tad more credit than you, at least he's not as
lazy as you are even if he's just as much a bigot.

Your mission (should you decide to accept it) is to animate Tusseladd's
Fig 3. using Java, allowing the user to set the speed to see what is going
on in the rotating frame, the lab frame and the SR (=aether) frame.
This tape will self-destruct in five months, that should be enough
time.

You may outdo Wilson, you lazy fraudulent bigot, and you can outdo
my animation, but you will not defeat me.
"Nope" is not an acceptable reply, nor are phase-shift jumps at
the corners acceptable.
The gauntlet is down. Shut the fuck up and get on with it YOU COWARDLY 
BIGOT!

===================================================
You can whine and deny all to want to, fuckheaded bigot, but it's Einstein
and Tom&Jeery you are denying.

For a cosmic muon with v = 0.999c, it's natural lifespan = 2.2 usec.
ref:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon

Einstein's calculation is tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2),
ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img61.gif


2.2usec  * sqrt(1-0.999^2) =  0.098362 usec

So cosmic muons which normally decay in 2.2 usec therefore map to "a
narrower set of values tau in the relatively moving frame"(--Tom&Jeery)
and only last for a maximum of 0.01 usec.
"These effects are regularly seen" -- Tom&Jeery.


I would estimate that more than likely you are a deranged insane old
faggot called "Tom the Minor Crank", pretending he could be the
pretty radiologist "Geraldine" he met in hospital when he went for an
X-ray, living out his fantasies on usenet and believing anyone can be
fooled by it.

REPEAT:
2.2 usec in the stationary frame, tau = 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the moving
frame. Einstein's equation - not a thing you can do about it, I can squeeze
your balls and you can only squeal. And I'm not letting go until you cry
"uncle" or fuck off out of here, you bastard. I'm teaching physics to guys
like Gehan and tords like you are in the way. Fucking weep, arsehole.
It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you FUCKING LYING
INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT
COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS!