🚀 go-pugleaf

------- ahahahaha... Unbelievable! ... AHAHAHAHA... ---------
>
Danny Clark "bobd" <clark.r.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
Einstein's Equations work well for certain applications like GPS. 
> 
hanson wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA.. ahahaha... Only Einstein Dingleberries 
(ED) have that fetish and labor under such delusions....  but 
>
******** GPS NEVER NEEDED neither SR nor GR ******* 
NOT FOR ITS DESIGN, MFGR., TESTING NOR OPERATIONS. 
--------- NO EINSTEIN SHIT IS NEEDED AT ALL ----------
-----------  ::::  http://tinyurl.com/6frczv   :::: ------------ -------
>
::: Furthermore, if GPS would have needed or used any 
::: Einstein shit then that case/event would appear in large 
::: print on all the Seller's promo literature... but as seen in 
::: here, it does NOT:    http://tinyurl.com/645yo5 
>
Now, if you wanna engage in mental masturbations & wish
to TELL  a  STORY about, or DESCRIBE GPS, then do 
what every middle school student can do for that system,
in ONE fell swoop by  ***Newtonian*** mechanics with: 
==  (M_e /h ) * (2 G/c^2) * 86400 =  38 microsec  == 
ONE equation instead of the 39 required by Ashby, the ED.
http://tinyurl.com/622an2  or http://tinyurl.com/57asbg 
>
>
---------  IMPORTANT for YOUR JOB PROSPECTS ------
>
Why are there still those besotted fuck-heads that still
promulgate SR/GR shit & its supposed general importance? 
Here is the  result and its sad and sorry, current story and 
complaint from a young brilliant physics PhD, who did hang 
out here in these NGs... my Friend, Dr. Gregory Hansen.
Read what all that Einstein shit he was required to study has
earned him and what prospects for a living it gave him:
>
 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/18a1ee1ba1110c7b
>
or in --------- :::::  http://tinyurl.com/q7gwjc  :::: -------------
>  
>
Danny Clark continued and worte: 
> Abnomalies with the Einstein gravity theory:
> Unexplained increase of momentum in sling-shot manouvers 
> performed in space.
> The earth is moving away from the sun at a greater rate than 
> can be accounted for by the sun loosing mass alone.
> Unexplained speed of the pioneer space craft now at the 
> edge of the solar system.
> The abnomaly in the moon's orbit when the sun earth and moon 
> line up in that order.(Bet all you PhD's have never heard of this 
> one, it's buried under a ton of concrete but it's there! 
> Will provide a link if required)
> 
> Modern physics is not a love of the truth like the classical physics
> before the 1905, but a love of the power and the prestiege of those in
> high positions. Any change in the status quo(ala Eintein) and these
> men would loose the power they love so dearly. Many a respected
> scientist has proclaimed that Einstein was wrong and this has killed
> their reputation over night, baring them from ever publishing their
> work again.
> 
> Circa 1889 Two physicists by the name of Michelson-Morley carried out
> an experiment not to find a absolute frame of reference as modern
> publications would have us believe but to detect the existance of the
> "aether" a substance that was alleged to fill all space. Waves in the
> "aether" were thought to be electromagnetic waves and Gravity,
> Magnetism and electrostatic forces were forces of the aether to.
> Aether particles or atherons were calculated to be 4000 times smaller
> than the Hydrogen atom and thus freely penetrate all matter
> interacting with it. The Michelson-Morley experiment used light beams
> to detect the "aether wind" as the earth moved through it. The result
> was a negative. The aether idea was not abandoned at first as a
> Mathmatician by the name of Lorentz developed what was to be called
> Lorentz contractions. This stated that objects moving through the
> aether would have there physical properties altered so that it
> appeared there was a negative result but actually there wasn't. He was
> wrong. Circa the 1930's a french scientist by the name of Sagnac
> detected the aether. It wasn't the aether wind as first thought, no,
> the aether was being dragged around the earth by the interaction of
> the aether and mass. Aether under strain causes force on mass and the
> opposite is true also. This also explains the GPS-Relativity situation
> as if you have a ball spinning in a fluid the fluid will spin faster
> at the surface of the ball than that a greater distance. Density of
> the fluid will change also. They say the simplest explanation is
> always the correct one and I hold that the above is true to this
> saying also.
> 
> Someone asked me, "If there is a substance through all space then why
> can't see it". I replied, "If you are looking through a perfectly
> clear window why can't you see that also? Because it is the medium the
> light travel through." Yes the aether refracts light to. The aether
> about the sun is at a different density to the rest of the solar
> system so light is refracted near it's surface. This was labelled by
> Einstein as "gravitational attraction of light" and the calculations
> for it were perfected by Newton, Euler and Laplace? long before
> Einstein was even born. I was also asked by the same person "why can't
> we feel this aether". I replied, "Can't we??? How do you account for
> inertia and momentum without some sort of substance interacting with
> the mass."
> 
> Countless others agree that Einstein was wrong, why even Steven
> Hawking and Sir Martin Ree's.
> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts
>
>
hanson wrote:
<http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c5cdbe547c0c8cfc>
>
----------  or in  ::::  http://tinyurl.com/aq5yrd  ::::  --------------
>
Danny, you can condense the Saga of Einstein's shit even more
because in the pathetic GR, Einstein **always** needs Newton's 
humble "G" in each and everyone of his GR solutions...ahahaha... 
about which Einstein openly and very lucidly finally confessed to, 
in 1954, in a letter to Besso, just a year before Albert folded his 
relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket & finally 
puffed,  Einstein wrote: 
>
::AE:: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based 
::AE:: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that 
::AE:: case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, [my] 
::AE:: gravitation theory included." 
>
Even worse, ever since the early 1920's Einstein urged his dangling
Dingleberries with these and other admonitions: 
>
::AE::"Not to search in the well lit place where he had
::AE:: cast his light". -- and he pointed out that --
::AE:: "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to 
::AE:: reality, they are not certain; and as far as they 
::AE:: are certain, they do not refer to reality." 
::AE::"why would anyone be interested in getting exact 
::AE:: solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?" 
>
This take is reflected in the real world where one can see
by 4 simple lines where they laugh about Einstein's shit
and where they still hang onto it, like:
>
 mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit" 
= *.edu and grantology ...................."does use REL,  No shit" 
= Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload" 
= Jews defend it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not". 
>
Furthermore, in the world of physico-politics, which was used by
the Zionists to propel Einstein and his REL shit into the limelight, 
SR/GR is used, even to day, in even more bizarre fashions and
forms, ... ... --- especially in countries such as in England, where 
the Zios had laws enacted that throw you in jail, if you disagree, 
----.... where people like poster Ian Parker (IP) reacts and poses 
as a Zio-shill and **honors SR/GR into and down the drain** by 
using the term "Nazi" 12 times on a single page of his website 
when he refers to SR/GR ... ahahaha... http://tinyurl.com/dhag28 
>
::IP::  --- http://ianparker.g3z.com/Relativity/Hoax.htm,  --- 
wherein these lines appear:
::IP:: ... why do people bother to debate Relativity? 
::IP:: [it] is inseparable from anti-Semitism in general. 
::IP:: I have said, always more Nazis in the US than Communists. 
::IP:: There is a secret world which is undermining Middle East peace. 
::IP:: http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-leaders-einstein-hoax1.html   
::IP:: Heil Hitler! 
::IP:: The Retic company [apparently referring to himself, Ian Parker], 
::IP::  is a front for someone. Who? & then Retic/Parker cites 
::IP:: http://www.jewwatch.com/index.htm 
>
____________________________________________
Einstein Relativity is a tool used by the few to fool the many.
-----------------------------------------
>
_____________________________________________
Einstein Relativity is the  Kosher Tax levied onto academia.
>
... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA...So much for Einstein and his 
Dingleberries. As can be seen in these NG's and elsewhere on the 
web,  all Einstein Dingleberries are mentally damaged goods that 
never knew and much less will acknowledge that Albert and his 
Zios took them for a ride... "oye weh!".. "Trust Me!"..."Go Figure"
... and thanks for the laughs... AHAHAHA...  ahahahahahanson