Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6603Re: gravitational bending of light, surprising?
From: Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:32
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:32
22 lines
3143 bytes
3143 bytes
On 19 Maj, 13:22, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 19, 12:05 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Then the clever teacher should explain: "Brothers Einsteinans, > > Einstein's 1911 calculation based on Newton's emission theory of light > > was wrong/correct and inconsistent/consistent with the gravitational > > redshift factor 1+V/c^2, Einstein's 1916 calculation was correct/wrong > > and consistent/inconsistent with the gravitational redshift factor 1+V/ > > c^2, but in any case the speed of light in a gravitational field is > > VARIABLE. So those who teach you that the speed of light in a > > gravitational field is constant are by no means clever teachers." > > You know, Pentcho, at some point you should take responsibility for > your own confusion -- and CORRECT it -- rather than pinning the blame > on teachers for your confusion. It's really not a big deal. It happens > to students every day that they misunderstand something that their > teacher said... And you still have not understood time dilation since the day you opended Taylor and Wheeler.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0874b2e3-8e45-407b-a650-dd3f2470f493@s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a7b0e74b-9bf4-4efb-8fce-eeb63f7421eb@g31g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <gu1l24$g$2@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <8t4905pgpb95f0cakr67a4cvmijpo2jbpa@4ax.com> <gucu8l$5b5$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <bm1m05pvboo6qsbi09f9neldil94pq8gd4@4ax.com> <guhhas$jpj$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <537957a8-0667-4a3e-995d-e0e8f0fa20db@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <gus2t0$jim$2@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <ab222092-4927-45ec-8083-5d75b3aa6754@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <704af1cc-6f99-4478-ab24-a893f228650d@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: d820f4ac3c,781ee9e876b3dd65 X-Google-Attributes: gidd820f4ac3c,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Strich-Reply-To-Idiots <strich.9993@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,sci.astro,alt.philosophy Subject: Re: gravitational bending of light, surprising? Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 22 Message-ID: <0874b2e3-8e45-407b-a650-dd3f2470f493@s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> References: <a7b0e74b-9bf4-4efb-8fce-eeb63f7421eb@g31g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <gu1l24$g$2@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <8t4905pgpb95f0cakr67a4cvmijpo2jbpa@4ax.com> <gucu8l$5b5$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <bm1m05pvboo6qsbi09f9neldil94pq8gd4@4ax.com> <guhhas$jpj$1@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <537957a8-0667-4a3e-995d-e0e8f0fa20db@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <gus2t0$jim$2@skeeter.ucdavis.edu> <ab222092-4927-45ec-8083-5d75b3aa6754@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <704af1cc-6f99-4478-ab24-a893f228650d@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.130.7.65 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242754346 24517 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2009 17:32:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=152.130.7.65; posting-account=-Yr6sAoAAAArJwgdHLA4MBxm4oIdzdtZ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 VHASAMGAT2, 1.1 wbcres4 (NetCache NetApp/6.0.2P1), 1.1 wbcres4 (NetCache NetApp/6.0.2P1)