🚀 go-pugleaf

On 10 Mag, 10:55, old...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 10 Mag, 06:19, RP <no_mail_no_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:> On May 9, 7:03 pm, "Sue..." <suzysewns...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> i beg you pardon for the intrusion..but when i read 'dark matter' , i
> think with amusement that all should fall down if the cosmic distances
> ( measured today only with the sacred redshift ) were overextimed ..
> ( in that fantavision , i address to the works of Arp, Van Flandern
> and the hipotesis of my dog inwww.bbamateur.bizhosting.com and  in
> 'co(s)mic observations' in  www.bbamateur.blogspot.com) ..some days
> ago i proposed the knowing of the experiment of Hayden : perheps
> somebody is drinking bier in the shadow to counting belches ... where
> are the smarting minds of the Androcles ( with lions ) , Valevs , Van
> Mortens, Andersons, Kholklovs ... don't say something to somebody the
> name H. C.Hayden ?( Haydin was a classic musician , no rock ) ..i
> report the words of    Selleri '' We finish noting that the  resultats
> gotten untill here , confirm the qualitative observation (( not only ,
> like i showed in 'some years later ..clock in washmachine' )) di
> Hayden : there are necessary to the electromagmetic signals about 300
> ns. 'in plus' for doing the complete turn of the planet verso east
> than verso owest ; the fact can only signify that the speed of ligth
> is different in the two senses '' ... now boys : you have  a week for
> make and post a small thougth ...our ambition is joint quantitatively
> the experiments of Sagnac  ''Compt. Rend. 157,708 and 1410 (1913) ; J.
> de Phys. 4,177 (1914) '' ..Michelson e Gale Astroph. J. 61, 137
> (1925) ..H.C.Hayden Physics Essays 8,366(1995) ...Einstein knew well
> works of Michelson also around the Sagnac effect , but in all his life
> cunningly did not make little thougths over the word Sagnac ..

..first concusions..: Sagnac did a logic formula which forecast the
fringes' movement in a rotating device ; he forecasted so convincently
(a device 1000 time bigger than his platform ) that Michelson & Gale
( two yankies   ! ) realized in 300.000 m.^2 of land with positive
resultat ...: Einstein and his relativity should not have done that :
he remained in the shadow cashing E=m*V^2  ...and then, why V^2 or not
1/2*V^2 , for example ?