🚀 go-pugleaf

On 6 mayo, 14:10, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots <strich.9...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 6 Maijs, 11:58, papa_r...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 6 mayo, 10:18, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots <strich.9...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On 6 Maijs, 10:04, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Tell us why your schizo mind wandered off to odometers?
>
> > > > > We were talking about the Manned Mission to the Moon being a complete
> > > > > success relying only on NEWTONIAN physics.
>
> > > > Right. What's your point?
>
> > > Right in front of your eyes.
>
> > > The Manned Mission to the Moon relied only on NEWTONIAN physics.
>
> > > Relativity is but a superfluous window dressing on the real physics.
> > > As I have said, the precise calculations needed to complete the
> > > mission to the moon was a complete success without having to use so
> > > called corrections from general relativity.
>
> > David, you appear to love pyrrhic victories right?. I told you I don't
> > need Special or General Relativity to find my way to Walmart...
>
> Cheech, get it into your thick skull that Walmart is NOT the moon...
> Cheech, get it into your thick skull that Walmart is NOT the moon...
> Cheech, get it into your thick skull that Walmart is NOT the moon...
>
> > (I can
> > even walk to it) and, of course, you did not get it (your 200IQ not
> > working).
> > But you know...you are wrong anyways.
> > Apollo missions relied heavily on numerous manual course corrections,
> > when using the translunar injection (TLI).
>
> Obviously the TLI did not need relativity...
> Obviously the TLI did not need relativity...
> Obviously the TLI did not need relativity...
>
> > What it means is that after
> > the initial impulse, the ships were deviating from the calculated
> > path, making necessary those manual corrections.
>
> Due to the small but unpredictable effects of friction, other
> celestial bodies, as well as rounding off errors.
> Due to the small but unpredictable effects of friction, other
> celestial bodies, as well as rounding off errors.
> Due to the small but unpredictable effects of friction, other
> celestial bodies, as well as rounding off errors.
>
> > Astrodynamics is the application of celestial mechanics to the
> > practical problems concerning the motion of rockets and other
> > spacecraft. The motion of these objects is usually calculated from
> > Newton's laws of motion and Newton's law of universal gravitation. It
> > is a core discipline within space mission design and control.
> > Celestial mechanics treats more broadly the orbital dynamics of
> > systems under the influence of gravity, including both spacecraft and
> > natural astronomical bodies such as star systems, planets, moons, and
> > comets. Orbital mechanics focuses on spacecraft trajectories,
> > including orbital maneuvers, orbit plane changes, and interplanetary
> > transfers, and is used by mission planners to predict the results of
> > propulsive maneuvers. General relativity is a more exact theory than
> > Newton's laws for calculating orbits, and is sometimes necessary for
> > greater accuracy or in high-gravity situations.
>
> Yet GR was not needed nor required for the Moon Landings...

Wow!!!!:

Strich wrote (in triplicate) "Due to the small but unpredictable
effects of friction, other celestial bodies, as well as rounding off
errors."

Priceless!!!!

We need more of that David...it is hilarious!!!!!

Miguel Rios