Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6815Re: THE WAVE MODEL OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA
From: RP
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 11:45
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 11:45
50 lines
4080 bytes
4080 bytes
On May 2, 11:16 pm, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote: > On May 2, 8:29 pm, RP <no_mail_no_s...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > I left of the clincher. Go back to Einstein's famous thought > > experiment of the observer in an elevator. In this case Einstein > > argues that such an observer cannot distinguish his inertial > > acceleration from a gravitational field. > > EWver heard about Eotvos, horse's ass? No? > There is also a large body of experiments that test EEP. You are too > busy huffing and puffing yourself, Richard Perry, trying to make > yourself look important to "waste" your time checking facts. > > > From this argument he argues > > in favor of the equivalence principle, stating that gravitational > > forces are exactly the same as inertial forces because they are > > completely indistinguishable. From this is derived the equivalence of > > inertial and gravitaitonal mass. > > So, you didn't hear about Eotvos, horse's ass ..... > > > Well there is no mystery here when it is accepted that gravitational > > forces are electromagnetic in orign. > > No, it isn't. The scientist that manages to explain gravitation is in > line for the Nobel prize, the subject is still unexplained. > > > In the case of the observer on > > the elevator, as already explained, the forces are exclusively > > electromagnetic. > > Explained by the crank Robert Perry? No, thank you. > > > So here Einstein is equating gravity, an attractive > > force, to a repulsive electromagnetic force. > > No, he's not. Only an old crank like you can make such stupid claims. > > > I'm certain that had he > > percieved his blunder here, he would have imm..ediately recanted all > > of his papers on GR, and immediately set out to correct that error. > > ....or, better even, he would have called the orderlies to readjust > your restrains and administer the appropiate drugs for your delusions. Here you are showing your shallowness once again. I most certainly understand the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass. You simply either didn't read what I said, or are perpetually stupid.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<93c96464-d162-4a84-86d9-d156f4619604@s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<5112e7a6-900b-48c5-b6be-f94e7f0e1b88@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <8c0809ca-3771-4cfc-817a-b29c98e0e42e@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <FY2dnXD90tmM6mHUnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9558276b-162a-41fd-9810-ca6acf529904@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66049b8f-812d-4dd8-8fec-c36ba7032783@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <82fcbdb8-0ddb-4e94-959e-2281de613b19@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <d60f678c-6696-46d7-87d3-eb9c4521ce48@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <017765c1-eb15-45c9-a0dc-253b2ed38422@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66fc4f89-4543-4c28-bf01-cd0b216f2947@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: d820f4ac3c,ba5f828f530b3984 X-Google-Attributes: gidd820f4ac3c,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: RP <no_mail_no_spam@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,sci.astro,alt.philosophy Subject: Re: THE WAVE MODEL OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <93c96464-d162-4a84-86d9-d156f4619604@s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> References: <5112e7a6-900b-48c5-b6be-f94e7f0e1b88@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <8c0809ca-3771-4cfc-817a-b29c98e0e42e@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <FY2dnXD90tmM6mHUnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9558276b-162a-41fd-9810-ca6acf529904@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66049b8f-812d-4dd8-8fec-c36ba7032783@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <82fcbdb8-0ddb-4e94-959e-2281de613b19@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <d60f678c-6696-46d7-87d3-eb9c4521ce48@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <017765c1-eb15-45c9-a0dc-253b2ed38422@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66fc4f89-4543-4c28-bf01-cd0b216f2947@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.120.147.112 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241351130 25857 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2009 11:45:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.120.147.112; posting-account=8gzREwkAAADXDFGUy6Z1kZHNqsMr5L-X User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)