🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6815

Re: THE WAVE MODEL OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA

#6815
From: RP
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 11:45
50 lines
4080 bytes
On May 2, 11:16 pm, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On May 2, 8:29 pm, RP <no_mail_no_s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I left of the clincher.  Go back to Einstein's famous thought
> > experiment of the observer in an elevator.  In this case Einstein
> > argues that such an observer cannot distinguish his inertial
> > acceleration from a gravitational field.
>
> EWver heard about Eotvos, horse's ass? No?
> There is also a large body of experiments that test EEP. You are too
> busy huffing and puffing yourself, Richard Perry, trying to make
> yourself look important to "waste" your time checking facts.
>
> > From this argument he argues
> > in favor of the equivalence principle, stating that gravitational
> > forces are exactly the same as inertial forces because they are
> > completely indistinguishable. From this is derived the equivalence of
> > inertial and gravitaitonal mass.
>
> So, you didn't hear about Eotvos, horse's ass .....
>
> > Well there is no mystery here when it is accepted that gravitational
> > forces are electromagnetic in orign.
>
> No, it isn't. The scientist that manages to explain gravitation is in
> line for the Nobel prize, the subject is still unexplained.
>
> > In the case of the observer on
> > the elevator, as already explained, the forces are exclusively
> > electromagnetic.
>
> Explained by the crank Robert Perry? No, thank you.
>
> > So here Einstein is equating gravity, an attractive
> > force, to a repulsive electromagnetic force.
>
> No, he's not. Only an old crank like you can make such stupid claims.
>
> > I'm certain that had he
> > percieved his blunder here, he would have imm..ediately recanted all
> > of his papers on GR, and immediately set out to correct that error.
>
> ....or, better even, he would have called the orderlies to readjust
> your restrains and administer the appropiate drugs for your delusions.

Here you are showing your shallowness once again. I most certainly
understand the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass. You
simply either didn't read what I said, or are perpetually stupid.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <93c96464-d162-4a84-86d9-d156f4619604@s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <5112e7a6-900b-48c5-b6be-f94e7f0e1b88@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <8c0809ca-3771-4cfc-817a-b29c98e0e42e@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <FY2dnXD90tmM6mHUnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9558276b-162a-41fd-9810-ca6acf529904@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66049b8f-812d-4dd8-8fec-c36ba7032783@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <82fcbdb8-0ddb-4e94-959e-2281de613b19@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <d60f678c-6696-46d7-87d3-eb9c4521ce48@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <017765c1-eb15-45c9-a0dc-253b2ed38422@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <66fc4f89-4543-4c28-bf01-cd0b216f2947@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: d820f4ac3c,ba5f828f530b3984
X-Google-Attributes: gidd820f4ac3c,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: RP <no_mail_no_spam@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,sci.astro,alt.philosophy
Subject: Re: THE WAVE MODEL OF LIGHT AND EINSTEINIANA
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <93c96464-d162-4a84-86d9-d156f4619604@s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
References: <5112e7a6-900b-48c5-b6be-f94e7f0e1b88@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> 
 <8c0809ca-3771-4cfc-817a-b29c98e0e42e@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <FY2dnXD90tmM6mHUnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <9558276b-162a-41fd-9810-ca6acf529904@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <66049b8f-812d-4dd8-8fec-c36ba7032783@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <82fcbdb8-0ddb-4e94-959e-2281de613b19@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
 <d60f678c-6696-46d7-87d3-eb9c4521ce48@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
 <017765c1-eb15-45c9-a0dc-253b2ed38422@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <66fc4f89-4543-4c28-bf01-cd0b216f2947@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.120.147.112
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241351130 25857 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2009 11:45:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.120.147.112; 
 posting-account=8gzREwkAAADXDFGUy6Z1kZHNqsMr5L-X
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; 
 Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR
 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)