Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6843Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY
From: Don Stockbauer
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:15
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:15
80 lines
5945 bytes
5945 bytes
On Apr 18, 5:47 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 17, 12:53 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 9, 9:03 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Silly old interpretations of "redshift is due to a change in > > > wavelength" can only make clever cosmologists sick at heart: > > > >http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168 > > > Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: > > > "In the 1920s, when astronomers began to look at the spectra of stars > > > in other galaxies, they found something most peculiar: there were the > > > same characteristic sets of missing colors as for stars in our own > > > galaxy, but they were all shifted by the same relative amount toward > > > the red end of the spectrum. To understand the implications of this, > > > we must first understand the Doppler effect. As we have seen, visible > > > light consists of fluctuations, or waves, in the electromagnetic > > > field. The wavelength (or distance from one wave crest to the next) of > > > light is extremely small, ranging from four to seven ten-millionths of > > > a meter. The different wavelengths of light are what the human eye > > > sees as different colors, with the longest wavelengths appearing at > > > the red end of the spectrum and the shortest wavelengths at the blue > > > end. Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, > > > such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. > > > Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as > > > the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of > > > the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). > > > Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source > > > emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance > > > between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary. > > > This means that the wavelength of the waves we receive is shorter than > > > when the star was stationary. Correspondingly, if the source is moving > > > away from us, the wavelength of the waves we receive will be longer. > > > In the case of light, therefore, means that stars moving away from us > > > will have their spectra shifted toward the red end of the spectrum > > > (red-shifted) and those moving toward us will have their spectra blue- > > > shifted." > > > Similar idiocies: > > >http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=does-dark-energy-exist > > "Astronomers find, for example, that the light from distant galaxies > > is redder than that of nearby galaxies. This phenomenon, known as > > redshift, is neatly explained as a stretching of light waves by the > > expansion of space." > > Even greater idiocies (Einsteinians know no limits): > > http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7238/full/458587a.html > Nature 458, 587-589 (2 April 2009): "What about dark energy? The > observation that the expansion of the Universe is speeding up, instead > of slowing down owing to the mutual gravitational attraction of > matter, indicates that there is much more to the Universe than we > understand at present. The leading interpretation is that the Universe > is filled by something dubbed dark energy that ’antigravitates’. > Whereas the possibility for gravitational repulsion does not exist in > Newtonian gravity, it does exist in general relativity. The > equivalence between matter and energy means that gaseous pressures > caused by thermal molecular motions can be a source of gravitational > fields. The gravitational field of a fluid with sufficiently negative > pressure is repulsive. Although it may be difficult to imagine how > molecular motions can give rise to a negative pressure, it has been > realized that some of the quantum fields that arise in elementary- > particle theory allow for fluids with negative pressure. Dark energy > is thus simply the negative-pressure fluid that is postulated to > account for cosmic acceleration." > > Pentcho Valev > pva...@yahoo.com "There is more in Heaven and Earth than are dreamed of in your tiny little mind, Pentcho up hostilities."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<e8d2dc2a-639d-4751-bedd-af01fa670259@d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <7315aa83-5ee2-4f42-847b-1016da34a6a3@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Don Stockbauer <donstockbauer@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 80 Message-ID: <e8d2dc2a-639d-4751-bedd-af01fa670259@d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com> References: <c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <7315aa83-5ee2-4f42-847b-1016da34a6a3@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.90.200.94 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240056909 22298 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2009 12:15:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.90.200.94; posting-account=iBgNeAoAAADRhzuSC4Ai7MUeMmxtwlM7 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)