Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6846Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:53
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:53
44 lines
4044 bytes
4044 bytes
On Apr 9, 9:03 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Silly old interpretations of "redshift is due to a change in > wavelength" can only make clever cosmologists sick at heart: > > http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168 > Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: > "In the 1920s, when astronomers began to look at the spectra of stars > in other galaxies, they found something most peculiar: there were the > same characteristic sets of missing colors as for stars in our own > galaxy, but they were all shifted by the same relative amount toward > the red end of the spectrum. To understand the implications of this, > we must first understand the Doppler effect. As we have seen, visible > light consists of fluctuations, or waves, in the electromagnetic > field. The wavelength (or distance from one wave crest to the next) of > light is extremely small, ranging from four to seven ten-millionths of > a meter. The different wavelengths of light are what the human eye > sees as different colors, with the longest wavelengths appearing at > the red end of the spectrum and the shortest wavelengths at the blue > end. Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, > such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. > Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as > the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of > the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). > Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source > emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance > between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary. > This means that the wavelength of the waves we receive is shorter than > when the star was stationary. Correspondingly, if the source is moving > away from us, the wavelength of the waves we receive will be longer. > In the case of light, therefore, means that stars moving away from us > will have their spectra shifted toward the red end of the spectrum > (red-shifted) and those moving toward us will have their spectra blue- > shifted." Similar idiocies: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=does-dark-energy-exist "Astronomers find, for example, that the light from distant galaxies is redder than that of nearby galaxies. This phenomenon, known as redshift, is neatly explained as a stretching of light waves by the expansion of space." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a759f562374bb13c X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 44 Message-ID: <cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> References: <c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.207.40 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1239961993 13369 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2009 09:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.207.40; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)