🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6846

Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY

#6846
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:53
44 lines
4044 bytes
On Apr 9, 9:03 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Silly old interpretations of "redshift is due to a change in
> wavelength" can only make clever cosmologists sick at heart:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Time-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553380168
> Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3:
> "In the 1920s, when astronomers began to look at the spectra of stars
> in other galaxies, they found something most peculiar: there were the
> same characteristic sets of missing colors as for stars in our own
> galaxy, but they were all shifted by the same relative amount toward
> the red end of the spectrum. To understand the implications of this,
> we must first understand the Doppler effect. As we have seen, visible
> light consists of fluctuations, or waves, in the electromagnetic
> field. The wavelength (or distance from one wave crest to the next) of
> light is extremely small, ranging from four to seven ten-millionths of
> a meter. The different wavelengths of light are what the human eye
> sees as different colors, with the longest wavelengths appearing at
> the red end of the spectrum and the shortest wavelengths at the blue
> end. Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us,
> such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength.
> Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as
> the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of
> the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect).
> Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source
> emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance
> between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary.
> This means that the wavelength of the waves we receive is shorter than
> when the star was stationary. Correspondingly, if the source is moving
> away from us, the wavelength of the waves we receive will be longer.
> In the case of light, therefore, means that stars moving away from us
> will have their spectra shifted toward the red end of the spectrum
> (red-shifted) and those moving toward us will have their spectra blue-
> shifted."

Similar idiocies:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=does-dark-energy-exist
"Astronomers find, for example, that the light from distant galaxies
is redder than that of nearby galaxies. This phenomenon, known as
redshift, is neatly explained as a stretching of light waves by the
expansion of space."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,a759f562374bb13c
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a759f562374bb13c
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a759f562374bb13c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: THE FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM OF COSMOLOGY
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <cb77191e-5bad-4e68-a749-53ce0b7c4973@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
References: <c8351679-73f6-4a35-9982-cba63346bc8c@j8g2000yql.googlegroups.com> 
 <81cde9bb-518f-4a03-af7d-7d5d8b58cacd@e38g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <e49198d1-299a-4356-be6a-d405776fb90c@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.207.40
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1239961993 13369 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2009 09:53:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.207.40; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 
 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)