🚀 go-pugleaf

"Dr. Henri Wilson" <hw@..> wrote in message 
news:m8tpq490vho7o8u02cc3lm80mqvku099nl@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:05:49 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>When it comes to destroying human rationality, Einsteinians know no
>>limits. They continue to do so even when they are trying to abandon
>
>>A few years ago the salfsame Paul Davies explained why Divine Albert's
>>Divine Theory should be abandoned:
>>
>>http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=5538
>>Paul Davies: "Was Einstein wrong? Einstein's famous equation E=mc2 is
>>the only scientific formula known to just about everyone. The "c" here
>>stands for the speed of light. It is one of the most fundamental of
>>the basic constants of physics. Or is it? In recent years a few
>>maverick scientists have claimed that the speed of light might not be
>>constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the next Great
>>Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"
>
>>
>>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03/smolin03_print.html
>>Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
>>effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
>>the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
>>that says that the speed of light is a, universal constant. It's the
>>same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
>>sender or observer.
>
> Snip
>>up and slow down, yardsticks that contract and expand and bad jokes
>>using the word ''relative.''......''Perhaps relativity is too
>>restrictive for what we need in quantum gravity,'' Dr. Magueijo said.
>>''We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of
>>light.''
>
> Pencho, c is a universal constant....

Rubbish. The ejection velocity of a photon from an alloy is
different to the ejection velocity from a pure metal. You've been
listening to Einstein again.