🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7003

Re: Steve Carlip about the speed of light

#7003
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:21
43 lines
3584 bytes
On Feb 26, 9:42 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 25, 5:33 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/msg/c7eddf24b59b0840
> > Steve Carlip: "In special relativity, the speed of light is constant
> > when measured in any *inertial* frame.  In general relativity, the
> > appropriate generalization is that the speed of light is constant in
> > any freely falling reference frame (in a region small enough that
> > tidal effects can be neglected). In this passage, Einstein is not
> > talking about a freely falling frame, but rather about a frame at rest
> > relative to a source of gravity.  In such a frame, the speed of light
> > can differ from c, basically because of the effect of gravity
> > (spacetime curvature) on clocks and rulers."
>
> > Honest Carlip, is the gravitational frequency shift, e.g. that
> > measured by Pound and Rebka, caused by the fact that "the speed of
> > light can differ from c"? Your sillier brothers teach the
> > gravitational frequency shift is consistent with variable wavelength
> > while the speed of light remains constant, in accordance with the
> > formula:
>
> > frequency = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
>
> > Why don't you teach your sillier brothers, Honest Carlip? Is this
> > ambiguity the fundamental task of Einsteiniana?
>
> Brother Paul Davies wants to confuse you, Honest Carlip, but you will
> not be taken in, will you:
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/apr/10/spaceexploration.comment
> Paul Davies: "Then, in 1960, the third test was finally conducted with
> reasonable accuracy. Physicists at Harvard University measured a small
> shift in the frequency of gamma rays directed vertically up a tower,
> confirming that gravity slows time."

Unlike silly brother Paul Davies, somewhat cleverer brother Tom
Roberts could help you a lot, Honest Carlip. See how brother Tom
Roberts has almost solved the problem:

http://groups.google.com/group/fr.sci.physique/msg/44abc7dbb30db6c2

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6471d812-edfa-40be-88b0-7655b8402911@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <127ead9b-2d1d-463a-b15c-08ee8c75a02d@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <9e2e8695-6123-4616-95b7-62c7bd916577@z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e00c72c28eb86f87
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e00c72c28eb86f87
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e00c72c28eb86f87
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: Steve Carlip about the speed of light
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <6471d812-edfa-40be-88b0-7655b8402911@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: <127ead9b-2d1d-463a-b15c-08ee8c75a02d@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> 
 <9e2e8695-6123-4616-95b7-62c7bd916577@z1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.100.231.46
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1235636480 798 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2009 08:21:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.100.231.46; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)