🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 3, 9:38 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 6:47 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 1, 9:21 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 26, 4:23 pm, "Paul B. Andersen"
>
> > > <paul.b.ander...@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
> > > > J.B. wrote:
> > > > > On 25 Nov., 21:51, "Dirk Van de moortel"
> > > > > <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > >>   4e916daf-db77-4145-be62-ad2c262b9...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
>
> > > > >> I wouldn't know what EINSTEINIANS could be, but knowing you,
> > > > >> I guess that they HAVE A JOB, because IDIOTS HAVE NO JOB,
> > > > >> and are doomed to stand on a soapbox in the park and whine and
> > > > >> scream at those who do have the jobs and the fat cars.
>
> > > > >> Dirk Vdm
>
> > > > > Big Assholes need fat cars.
> > > > > Especially these full of shit instead of brains.
> > > > > These with an IQ smaller than their shoesize ...
>
> > > > In your website:http://home.arcor.de/josef.braunstein/einstein/idw.htm
>
> > > > You write:
> > > > <<
> > > >    Das Einzige, was bei M&M und Nachfolgern wie Kennedy-Thorndike bewiesen wurde,
> > > >    ist dass das Trägermedium des Lichts (egal ob Äther oder Vakuum, oder gar keins)
> > > >    sich mit der Erde mitbewegt, und sonst nichts.
> > > >  >>
>
> > > > In other words:
> > > > The MMX and KTX prove that the carrier-medium of light (ether)
> > > > is fully dragged by the Earth.
>
> > > > Are you aware that stellar aberration falsifies this theory?
> > > > That was known in 1887, why this rather obvious solution never
> > > > was considered to be an option.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Paul
>
> > > >http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/-Hidequotedtext -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Dear Paul: The Earth isn't dragging ether.  Ether is the mother energy
> > > which makes up all matter.  Such is flowing down vertically near the
> > > surface, and at an increasing angle further out.  
>
> > This is an interesting remark. An increasing angle in which direction?
> > Suppose I'm standing in Topeka, Kansas, and I'm facing east at 11am,
> > and I want to trace the flow of ether. Near the surface of the earth,
> > you say the ether flow is downward and nearly vertical. So higher up,
> > say at an elevation of 10 km, the ether flow is not quite vertical but
> > is at some angle with respect to the vertical. Is that angle oriented
> > to the north (to my left), to the south (to my right), to the east (in
> > front of me), or to the west (behind me)? Surely you have some
> > idea....- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Dear PD:  The ether behaves just like weather systems.  The ether flow
> forms spirals; and the "right hand rule" explains the direction of
> ether flow looking down from the north pole of the Earth. — NoEinstein
> —

Well, in weather systems note that the air doesn't spiral everywhere.
The air is flowing from high pressure spots to low pressure spots and
the spiral around the low-pressure spot is due to the Coriolis effect.
What this means is that if the low pressure zone is to the east of
you, the wind where you're standing will be definitely flowing in one
direction (to the south-east) and not in a spiral around your
location.

Now, were you supposing that there are low pressure regions of ether
and high pressure regions of ether on the surface of the earth? If so,
then what causes them?

And why is the north pole a preferred axis for rotation of the ether
flow?
(Note that the weather patterns you note do not include a circulation
of air in a circle around the north pole. That doesn't happen. Were
you under the impression that it does?

PD