🚀 go-pugleaf

On 26 Nov., 22:23, "Paul B. Andersen"
<paul.b.ander...@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
> J.B. wrote:
> > On 25 Nov., 21:51, "Dirk Van de moortel"
> > <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>   4e916daf-db77-4145-be62-ad2c262b9...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
>
> >> I wouldn't know what EINSTEINIANS could be, but knowing you,
> >> I guess that they HAVE A JOB, because IDIOTS HAVE NO JOB,
> >> and are doomed to stand on a soapbox in the park and whine and
> >> scream at those who do have the jobs and the fat cars.
>
> >> Dirk Vdm
>
> > Big Assholes need fat cars.
> > Especially these full of shit instead of brains.
> > These with an IQ smaller than their shoesize ...
>
> In your website:http://home.arcor.de/josef.braunstein/einstein/idw.htm
>
> You write:
> <<
>    Das Einzige, was bei M&M und Nachfolgern wie Kennedy-Thorndike bewiesen wurde,
>    ist dass das Trägermedium des Lichts (egal ob Äther oder Vakuum, oder gar keins)
>    sich mit der Erde mitbewegt, und sonst nichts.
>  >>
>
> In other words:
> The MMX and KTX prove that the carrier-medium of light (ether)
> is fully dragged by the Earth.
>
> Are you aware that stellar aberration falsifies this theory?
> That was known in 1887, why this rather obvious solution never
> was considered to be an option.
>
> --
> Paul
>
> http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -

That´s why I wrote "oder gar keins".

Stellar aberration falsifies NOTHING,
because we sit on the end of the light path.
If we could follow stellar light all the way,
THEN we could make some reliable conclusions.


JB