🚀 go-pugleaf

J.B. wrote:
> On 26 Nov., 23:10, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
>> "J.B." <jb_...@arcor.de> wrote in message
>>
>> news:5d0dd94a-6d1b-48b1-bf8f-dabfd37c506f@j39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> On 26 Nov., 22:23, "Paul B. Andersen"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <paul.b.ander...@guesswhatuia.no> wrote:
>>> J.B. wrote:
>>>> On 25 Nov., 21:51, "Dirk Van de moortel"
>>>> <dirkvandemoor...@nospAm.hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> 4e916daf-db77-4145-be62-ad2c262b9...@w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com
>>>>> I wouldn't know what EINSTEINIANS could be, but knowing you,
>>>>> I guess that they HAVE A JOB, because IDIOTS HAVE NO JOB,
>>>>> and are doomed to stand on a soapbox in the park and whine and
>>>>> scream at those who do have the jobs and the fat cars.
>>>>> Dirk Vdm
>>>> Big Assholes need fat cars.
>>>> Especially these full of shit instead of brains.
>>>> These with an IQ smaller than their shoesize ...
>>> In your website:http://home.arcor.de/josef.braunstein/einstein/idw.htm
>>> You write:
>>> <<
>>> Das Einzige, was bei M&M und Nachfolgern wie Kennedy-Thorndike bewiesen
>>> wurde,
>>> ist dass das Tr�germedium des Lichts (egal ob �ther oder Vakuum, oder gar
>>> keins)
>>> sich mit der Erde mitbewegt, und sonst nichts.
>>> In other words:
>>> The MMX and KTX prove that the carrier-medium of light (ether)
>>> is fully dragged by the Earth.
>>> Are you aware that stellar aberration falsifies this theory?
>>> That was known in 1887, why this rather obvious solution never
>>> was considered to be an option.
>>> --
>>> Paul
>>> http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/-Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>> That�s why I wrote "oder gar keins".
>>
>> Stellar aberration falsifies NOTHING,
>> because we sit on the end of the light path.
>> If we could follow stellar light all the way,
>> THEN we could make some reliable conclusions.
>>
>> JB
>> =================================================
>> Are you aware Andersen is a proven liar, totally ignorant of mathematics
>> and journal content?
>>  http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/E%5E2/DeriveMC2.htm- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>>
>> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
> 
> He�s aparently also totally ignorant of posting content.
> 
> Yet another brainwashed Zombie playing back his programming.
> 
> Beam me up, Scotty, there are no intelligent Relativists on this
> planet ...
> 
> 
> no fun takling to machines,
> JB

Whether or not I am a brainwashed zombie is quite irrelevant
to the issue you are trying to escape from.
I understand that you find obscenities ("greedy ruthless Assholes")
more interesting than physics, but can you please try to liberate
yourself from your anal fixation and try to address the issue?

You _did_ write on your web page:
<<
    Das Einzige, was bei M&M und Nachfolgern wie Kennedy-Thorndike bewiesen wurde,
    ist dass das Tr�germedium des Lichts (egal ob �ther oder Vakuum, oder gar keins)
    sich mit der Erde mitbewegt, und sonst nichts.
  >>

But stellar aberration falsifies the theory that
"das Tr�germedium des Lichts sich mit der Erde mitbewegt".

Can you prove otherwise?
No?
You will have to rely on obscenities, then.
They make you look very smart, you know.

-- 
Paul, the brainwashed zombie

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/