Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7156Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields"
From: GSS
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:39
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:39
50 lines
4557 bytes
4557 bytes
On Jun 24, 10:53 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi GSS this is Conrad Countess
>
> In addition to what I said earlier, André Michaud sees a smooth
> transition between energy and matter employing the equation E=hf=mc^2.
What you have written above is not one equation but two.
E = hf ......... (1)
and
E=mc^2 ......... (2)
Whereas equation (1) gives the energy content of a photon of frequency
f, equation (2) gives the energy equivalent of the mass content of a
particle of 'rest mass' m.
However, there is an important re-interpretation of equation (2) as
m= E/c^2 ......... (3)
where m represents the measure of inertia (in units of mass) of any
energy content E 'constrained within a finite volume (box) of space'
relatively at rest in a 'fixed' reference frame like BCRF.
In the subject book under review, I have shown that all elementary
particles are essentially strain energy wave-packets constrained
(through equilibrium equations and boundary conditions) within a small
volume of space and are termed 'strain bubbles'. If E is the total
strain energy content (computed) for a given strain bubble then its
inertial mass is given by equation (3). Same considerations could be
applied, at least in principle, to the Dale's 'light in the box'
idea.
GSS
http://www.geocities.com/gurcharn_sandhu/index.html
> And he acknowledges that this equivalence coincides with the electron
> or positron mass and energy.. Is that too just coincidence? I don't
> think so.
>
> Hi Dale, the light in the box idea is interesting but if a gram of
> mass in a box were to suddenly get converted to energy there would be
> a huge atomic or nuclear explosion sending the box parts as
> projectiles with foot pounds of energy (foot pounds are a measurement
> of bullet striking power) far exceeding the original gram.. Does this
> suggest that the energy, including light itself, actually has more
> mass when liberated than at rest? Just wanted to throw that out there.
> That might really turn the idea that light does not have mass on its
> head.
>
> Conrad Countess
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<71825ad6-5b28-4fd0-940f-e6894baa992e@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<40567776-4f77-4932-b1bf-8b59e0e449f5@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <br2dnSVunJnPiv3VnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com> <ae9dd94a-f522-4545-9497-b34603572289@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <GtudnYgVMvRAg_3VnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com> <8f22612c-e3bc-4c93-b7ac-ec30d07caa1a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <OZqdnZJIlJTkv_3VnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com> <85233229-f0d3-4247-be58-1fb646f6c1ca@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <ALOdneFDcb3vmPzVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com> <746ad0ed-54a5-41af-bce9-ca04ec3c1349@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <svOdneRZSIgCufzVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com> <d3ca5df8-3f96-41ee-ad7a-d9288995f032@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SNKdnfE-Us6qsfzVnZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com> <f67bebdd-872d-4b77-94fc-87517b2f27cd@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1a01c8a7-f02a-43b2-9f9b-2a1716ceff1c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: f6c41,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,9d33f445b4dc86da X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,206ff459d40f3c02 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidf6c41,gidfa4c1,gid1038c2,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: GSS <gurcharn_sandhu@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,fr.sci.physique,alt.sci.physics.new-theories Subject: Re: Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, "Fundamental Nature of Matter and Fields" Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <71825ad6-5b28-4fd0-940f-e6894baa992e@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <40567776-4f77-4932-b1bf-8b59e0e449f5@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <br2dnSVunJnPiv3VnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@comcast.com> <ae9dd94a-f522-4545-9497-b34603572289@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <GtudnYgVMvRAg_3VnZ2dnUVZ_h3inZ2d@comcast.com> <8f22612c-e3bc-4c93-b7ac-ec30d07caa1a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> <OZqdnZJIlJTkv_3VnZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com> <85233229-f0d3-4247-be58-1fb646f6c1ca@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <ALOdneFDcb3vmPzVnZ2dnUVZ_iydnZ2d@comcast.com> <746ad0ed-54a5-41af-bce9-ca04ec3c1349@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <svOdneRZSIgCufzVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@comcast.com> <d3ca5df8-3f96-41ee-ad7a-d9288995f032@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <SNKdnfE-Us6qsfzVnZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d@comcast.com> <f67bebdd-872d-4b77-94fc-87517b2f27cd@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1a01c8a7-f02a-43b2-9f9b-2a1716ceff1c@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.167.11.159 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1214408355 27538 127.0.0.1 (25 Jun 2008 15:39:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=122.167.11.159; posting-account=2APXugoAAADkRMUHSY1XvGUVMY2N3xOK User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0) Gecko/2008061600 SUSE/3.0-1.1 Firefox/3.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)