🚀 go-pugleaf

"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message 
news:ijse24pthttvhu76cqau15r4rkj43rauk2@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 11 May 2008 09:56:20 +0100, "Androcles" 
<Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
| >news:b1bd24trj4vsj0bbc3i2kmrhv954irmcbn@4ax.com...
| >| On Sat, 10 May 2008 00:40:50 +0100, "Androcles"
|
| >| >| ...But the mind of a pommie engineer works in strange ways.
| >| >
| >| >vt is straight line, 2PiR is the circumference of a circle.
| >| >Adding them is ridiculous.
| >| >The mind of an aussie sheep shagger works in strange ways.
| >|
| >| vt is near enought to straght.
| >
| >ct is so near to straight that it almost completes a circle.
|
| In  a ring gyro, continuous internal reflection occurs. There is an 
infinite
| number of internal mirrors each reflecting the rays at an angle 
1/infinity. The
| rays effectively travel in straight lines.

Yeah, we know, circles are made of infinitesimally short straight lines. So 
is every
other curve in the book and so are straight lines themselves.
The rays EFFECTIVELY travel in a circle,  but you don't know what 
"effective"
means, you just want to ineffectively argue that you are effectively right 
when you
are just plain effectively wrong.


|
| >For one ray, (c+v)t = (2pi+alpha)R, for the other (c-v)t = (2pi-alpha)R.
|
| alphaR = vt, you silly old dope.
| You are saying that ct = 2piR.

Which it does, and
(c+v)t = (2pi + alpha)R,
(c-v)t = (2pi - alpha)R.

Moreover, I can make v = c/2 and it is still correct, alpha = pi, whereas 
you have a
straight line effectively subtracted from a semicircle.

Look, you stupid old sheep shagger, I know what you MEAN but all we are
debating here is the correct way to describe it algebraically.
That means no fucking change in t, only a change in distance.

t = (2pi + alpha)R / (c+v)
t = (2pi - alpha)R / (c-v)
t = 2pi.R/c

Now we do NOT have t on both sides of the equation, but your way we do.

| >t is the same in both cases, only the distance changes.
| >
| >Ewe are near enough to a sheep, ewe have the same mathematical
| >abilities as one. The drunken mind of an aussie sheep shagger works
| >in strange ways, making two spelling mistakes in one sentence,
| >"enought" and "straght".
|
| Fuck off.

Don't you mean Fuckt of?

Where's Poe? He's dropped off the radar for three weeks now and I
had him on the hook, begging me to tell him the experiment that
proves SR is crap. All my ducks in a row and he vanishes.