Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7382Re: Rest mass
From: Jeckyl
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:11
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:11
58 lines
3230 bytes
3230 bytes
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1184859142.542390.99710@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 16, 8:40 am, "Jeckyl" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote: >> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1184396996.855175.254140@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> >> > ------------ >> > To your question whether the photon has mass >> >> > the answwer is Yes >> >> Wrong .. the answer is NO >> >> > it has mass a verylittl eone >> >> Very little meaning ZERO >> >> > 2 >> > there is only jsy one kind of mass >> >> Although one can calculate other values that have units of mass and use >> the >> word 'mass' in their name. >> >> But yes, what is usually regarded as mass is the invariant, or rest, mass >> >> > you can choose any name for it >> > but jus tone knd of mass >> > (if you think about 'relatiovistic mass' >> > better forget about it >> >> Its not all that useful, but neither is it 'wrong' >> >> > and >> > how come that the phton has mas >> > and still movwes at c >> >> It doesn't have mass .. that is WHY it CAN move at c >> >> > ask Wormley he is a cleaver innovative sciensut >> > alternatively youcan ask Gisse >> >> And they will agree that a photon has no mass and moves at c >> >> [snip insults] > > ----------- > you are an idiot > and since yiouare an idit > you are a disturbed psychapth as well Typical poor rat response .. you get that from crackpost. > physics logic isnt that ?? (:-) You have no authority to talk about physics logic, as you show no understanding of either.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<469ffda3$0$2990$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out01a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!newsfeed.yul.equant.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.pacific.net.au!token.pipenetworks.com!218.100.2.59.MISMATCH!not-for-mailReferences:
<1184313271.795043.94440@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <LvSli.38021$YL5.212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1184394393.199242.180370@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1184396996.855175.254140@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <469b04ba$0$2992$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au> <1184859142.542390.99710@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,26176ef729f272a6 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,f9b17e69bf88ca2d X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,f9b17e69bf88ca2d X-Google-Thread: f74ae,f9b17e69bf88ca2d X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,f9b17e69bf88ca2d X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out01a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!newsfeed.yul.equant.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!newsfeed.pacific.net.au!token.pipenetworks.com!218.100.2.59.MISMATCH!not-for-mail From: "Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique References: <1184313271.795043.94440@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <LvSli.38021$YL5.212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1184394393.199242.180370@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <1184396996.855175.254140@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <469b04ba$0$2992$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au> <1184859142.542390.99710@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Rest mass Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:11:09 +1000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Lines: 61 Message-ID: <469ffda3$0$2990$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 121.44.47.35 X-Trace: 1184890275 un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au 2990 121.44.47.35:2771 X-Complaints-To: Abuse, including message IDs to abuse@pipenetworks.com