🚀 go-pugleaf

Gisse Gisse I have already taken the final decision: You will become a
PhD student of Master Jean Eisenstaedt, a French hypnotist. Master
Jean Eisenstaedt has found it suitabe to write this:

http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/publication/lna/detail/lna40/pgs/4_5.pdf
"Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la vitesse de la
lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi que de celle
de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il n'y a pas de
raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de Newton, pour que
la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa trajectoire - qu'une
particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de raison pour que la
lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation. Bref, pourquoi ne pas
appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie newtonienne ? C'est en fait
ce
que font plusieurs astronomes, opticiens, philosophes de la nature a
la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les resultats sont etonnants... et
aujourd'hui nouveaux."

"Therefore there is no theoretical reason why the speed of light
should not depend on the speed of the source and the speed of the
terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly, there is no reason,
in the framework of the logic of Newton's Principia, why light should
behave, as far as its trajectory is concerned, differently from a
material particle. Neither is there any reason why light should not be
sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why don't we apply the whole
Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is what many astronomers,
opticians, philosophers of nature did by the end of 18th century. The
results are surprising....and new nowadays."

So Gisse Gisse your PhD thesis will be entitled:

"A theory of relativity in which the speed of light does depend on the
speed of the light source."

Sycophants will immediately write: "Young Eric Gisse: the Albert
Einstein of our generation". We all will be happy, only Master Tom
Roberts will be sad.

Pentcho Valev