🚀 go-pugleaf

Pentcho Valev wrote:
> Gisse Gisse I have already taken the final decision: You will become a
> PhD student of Master Jean Eisenstaedt, a French hypnotist. Master
> Jean Eisenstaedt has found it suitabe to write this:

http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/publication/lna/detail/lna40/pgs/4_5.pdf
> "Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la vitesse de la
> lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi que de celle
> de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il n'y a pas de
> raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de Newton, pour que
> la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa trajectoire - qu'une
> particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de raison pour que la
> lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation. Bref, pourquoi ne pas
> appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie newtonienne ? C'est en fait
> ce
> que font plusieurs astronomes, opticiens, philosophes de la nature a
> la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les resultats sont etonnants... et
> aujourd'hui nouveaux."
>
> "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why the speed of light
> should not depend on the speed of the source and the speed of the
> terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly, there is no reason,
> in the framework of the logic of Newton's Principia, why light should
> behave, as far as its trajectory is concerned, differently from a
> material particle. Neither is there any reason why light should not be
> sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why don't we apply the whole
> Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is what many astronomers,
> opticians, philosophers of nature did by the end of 18th century. The
> results are surprising....and new nowadays."
>
> So Gisse Gisse your PhD thesis will be entitled:
>
> "A theory of relativity in which the speed of light does depend on the
> speed of the light source."
>
> Sycophants will immediately write: "Young Eric Gisse: the Albert
> Einstein of our generation". We all will be happy, only Master Tom
> Roberts will be sad.

Gisse Gisse more thoughts from Master Jean Eisenstaedt (rather
confused but still useful for your PhD thesis):

http://www.mfo.de/programme/schedule/2006/08c/OWR_2006_10.pdf
Jean Eisenstaedt: "Moreover, the existence of a theory dealing with
light, relativity and gravitation, embedded in Newton's Principia was
completely ignored by physicists and by historians as well. But it was
a simple and natural way to deal with the question of light,
relativity (and gravitation) in a Newtonian context. Einstein himself
did not know of this Newtonian theory of light and he did not rely on
it in his own research. But he was not very far from these ideas: he
wrote to Freundlich in 1913 that 'it was rather natural that the idea
of a bending of light appeared at the time of the theory of emission'.
But it was not his way to his relativity. This theory will not bring
us to the 'Einsteinian relativities' but it is still a most
interesting and simple approach to it."

Pentcho Valev