Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7446

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7446

From: jambaugh
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:12

10 lines
2554 bytes

Sorcerer Androcles wrote:
> "jambaugh" <ego@jamesbaugh.info> wrote in message news:1168712228.541964.195620@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Sorcerer Androcles wrote:
> I didn't say NM was approximate, xxxxx. Roberts said SR was
> approximate. xxxx

Your statement which I quoted is equivalent to the fact that SR and
Gallilean R (which NM uses) are equivalent when all velocities are <<
c, -- which I stated --.  Beyond that I'll say no more to you.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1168719138.122988.173990@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <XdBmh.242371$bz5.192605@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1167795780.694882.237800@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <RNImh.298068$Pk.172981@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168213510.581626.53610@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com> <rcnoh.34610$Kh7.5214@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168703169.715641.208460@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> <nG7qh.51808$QY6.12437@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <1168712228.541964.195620@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <GO9qh.52381$MO2.14739@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "jambaugh" <ego@jamesbaugh.info>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
Date: 13 Jan 2007 12:12:20 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <1168719138.122988.173990@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>
References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
   <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
   <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com>
   <XdBmh.242371$bz5.192605@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
   <1167795780.694882.237800@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <RNImh.298068$Pk.172981@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
   <1168213510.581626.53610@q40g2000cwq.googlegroups.com>
   <rcnoh.34610$Kh7.5214@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
   <1168703169.715641.208460@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>
   <nG7qh.51808$QY6.12437@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
   <1168712228.541964.195620@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
   <GO9qh.52381$MO2.14739@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.168.107.205
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168719155 6558 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2007 20:12:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:12:35 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <GO9qh.52381$MO2.14739@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.168.107.205;
   posting-account=Zpdfsg0AAAAdNz6L-gjTpkhKJm4SxYMG

Reply to Parent Message