Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7451

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7451

From: Autymn D. C.
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:44

20 lines
2412 bytes

Spirit of Truth wrote:
> "G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:5q2dna2vCelYEQbYnZ2dnUVZ_qKknZ2d@insightbb.com...
> > "Wolfgang G. Gasser" <z@z.lol.li> wrote in message
> > news:ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net...
> >> The impossibility of mutual time dilation in this situation entails the
> >> impossibility of a constant speed of light as a general law.
> >  If time stops, zeroes, at the speed of light as Einstein saw it must,
> > then propagation of light must be in zero time.

constant speed for constant speed

> How can time go forward at c when gap closure can be observed
> as closing at 2c?

Hap, not time, goes forward at c.  A gap is not a thing but two things.
 With the eye at rest it makes three things.  Liht is only a painting
for each eye.

-Aut

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1168465451.020590.196370@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <5q2dna2vCelYEQbYnZ2dnUVZ_qKknZ2d@insightbb.com> <eW2oh.2934$ji1.1611@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
Date: 10 Jan 2007 13:44:11 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1168465451.020590.196370@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
   <5q2dna2vCelYEQbYnZ2dnUVZ_qKknZ2d@insightbb.com>
   <eW2oh.2934$ji1.1611@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.238.129.55
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168465452 6928 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2007 21:44:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:44:12 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <eW2oh.2934$ji1.1611@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/312.8.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/312.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.238.129.55;
   posting-account=fUZnFA0AAAAS4Eae47dUE6rqvPUM7Ag1

Reply to Parent Message