Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7459Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
From: Koobee Wublee
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:38
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:38
50 lines
3162 bytes
3162 bytes
JanPB wrote:
> There are lots of junk books out there, not just in pop physics. Media
> always desperately try to create "heroes" for public consumption
> because it pays. That so many people around here believe physicists
> actually subscribe to those silly ideas ("Einstein=God" and similar
> nonsense) only proves the "it pays" point.
Physicists still believe in absolute silly things such as
** Principle of Relativity which has been proven false by
Hafele-Keating experiment, GPS, and more.
** Goedesics follow the path with the maximum amount of accumulated
spacetime.
** SR does not manifest the twin's paradox.
** ds^2 = g_ij dq^i dq^j = f(dq, dq)
g_ij = f()
** All solutions to the field equations where the equations are only
valid with one specific choice of coordinate system suddenly represent
a unified solution with each solution associated with each possible
choice of coordinate system.
** GPS proves GR and/or SR where some certain crackpots may not agree
that GPS does prove SR.
** Field equations were derived while Einstein fancying himself in
free fall.
** Einstein Equivalence Principle is the most power of them all
despite it serves no real purpose. Galileo's principle of
equivalence paved the way for Newton's law of gravity.
** The math-illiterate, Einstein, himself can come up with the math of
the field equations.
** ...
And the most absurd of it all.
** The curvature in spacetime is caused by energy where energy is an
observed phenomenon.
Arguing for any of the points above would make the discussion about
(Einstein = God) more serious.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1168641497.084309.305620@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168628267.272940.111510@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dcf57fa2a8523cf9 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dcf57fa2a8523cf9 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dcf57fa2a8523cf9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'? Date: 12 Jan 2007 14:38:17 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 51 Message-ID: <1168641497.084309.305620@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> References: <1168608887.104177.293060@i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1168614617.808260.204340@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1168628267.272940.111510@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.158.90.15 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168641514 27600 127.0.0.1 (12 Jan 2007 22:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:38:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1168628267.272940.111510@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=132.158.90.15; posting-account=qH5b2g0AAADxdyyR4If1Q7TLaSxErZPT