Re: The Simplest Genuine Refutation of Special Relativity

Article View: sci.physics.relativity

Article #7485

Back to sci.physics.relativity Previous Next

#7485

From: karandash2000
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:19

28 lines
2856 bytes

Wolfgang G. Gasser wrote:
<imbecilic prteamble snipped as irrelevant>
>
> With respect to each observer the light beam in the opposite clock
> can only propagate at c, if the rate of this clock is gamma = 100
> times lower than the observer clock rate*. On the other hand, if
> the clock rates of both light clocks are equal, then with respect
> to each observer the velocity of the beam in the opposite clock is
> composed of the two orthogonal components c and v, resulting in a
> speed of light of c_v = sqrt(v^2 + c^2) = 1.41c.
>

Really c_v = sqrt(v^2 + c^2) = 1.41c.? What gave you this idea? Did you
pull it from your brain or from your posterior (not that it makes any
difference)


> * This gamma time dilation leads to a gamma reduction in the speed
>   of the opposite clock beam from c to c/gamma. This opposite clock
>   is moving at v with respect to the observer, and this movement
>   is orthogonal to the light beam direction. Therefore the velocity
>   of the beam with respect to the opposite observer results in
>   the hypotenuse of the right-angled triangle with the legs v and
>   c/gamma_v, and we get: c_v = sqrt(v^2 + (c/gamma_v)^2) = c

Really?  What gave you this idea? Did you pull it from your brain or
from your posterior (not that it makes any difference)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1167934786.027843.4080@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <enjf3m$q39$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: karandash2000@yahoo.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique
Subject: Re: The Simplest Genuine Refutation of Special Relativity
Date: 4 Jan 2007 10:19:46 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1167934786.027843.4080@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
   <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
   <enjf3m$q39$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.36.122.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167934791 9664 127.0.0.1 (4 Jan 2007 18:19:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:19:51 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <enjf3m$q39$1@atlas.ip-plus.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.36.122.2;
   posting-account=3tLXaQ0AAABbjRCHFo0WYZUixC8BIz3W

Reply to Parent Message