Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7496Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity
From: Mike
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:18
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:18
32 lines
2457 bytes
2457 bytes
karandash2000@yahoo.com wrote: > Henri Wilson wrote: > > > > > > So the GPS clocks that you claim prove SR correct move in straight lines do > > they Snipper? > > > > To your great disappointment, "dr. Henri", GPS proves BOTH SR AND GR > correct. Without the SR/GR adjustments, your car would turn into the > city garbage dump instead of taking you to your home for the Alzheimer > retards. Which would be the appropriate thing (in your case). Even if SR/GR was never invented it would be a trivial engineering task to determine the upfront correction to the clocks before sending them to orbit so that the receivers will operate at a given accuracy level. It turns out the correction is just a constant. Are you so stupid after all? Mike > > http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 104cdc,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,dd7f3cb108988984 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gid104cdc,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.philosophy.tech,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: The Simplest Refutation of Special Relativity Date: 2 Jan 2007 16:18:04 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 33 Message-ID: <1167783484.368323.272830@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> References: <ene0td$grh$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <dSymh.10793$yC5.9487@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> <rvflp2ltoun34hcs762k0k596o7b5bu77h@4ax.com> <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.73.135.61 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167783490 28675 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2007 00:18:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 00:18:10 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1167780307.600307.68300@h40g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.73.135.61; posting-account=u3EDPg0AAADaLcRunJk5L0Cw4LDDaXak