Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #75Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
From: Graham Cooper
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57
53 lines
3921 bytes
3921 bytes
On Oct 17, 6:27 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 17 Okt., 06:43, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Problem solved then! The infinite triangle has been proportionately
> > shrunk such that there are infinitely many finite rows!
>
> That's the basic trick of all matheology:
>
> There are pot. infinitely many finite natural numbers.
> Abracadabra.
I don't consider a complete N the problem,
it's when they combine SETS and INFINITE OBJECTS
they move into 2 dimensions in the most naive way
and ignore the constraints of combining the 2 methods.
FOR INSTANCE: DEFINE DIAGONAL
Ad, DIAG[d] = LIST[d,d]
a trivial corollary is
~Er, Ad, LIST[r,d] =/= DIAG[d]
Instead they IGNORE THE COROLLARY and "CONSTRUCT" a non existent
version
~Er, Ad, LIST[r,d] = ANTI(DIAG[d])
> There is a fixed number of finite natural numbers, and obviously that
> must be larger than every natural number.
>
> As you say, the triangle gets shrunk. Effect of gravitation. But what
> when turned by 90°?
>
So how do you explain {Champerno..} constant.
0.123456789101112131415....
or this one
0.10110111011110111110111111011111110111111110....
A small turing machine will construct this on a tape indefinitely!
Herc
--
http://Matheology
It's Bigger Than Infinity!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a145cecd-9c0f-4779-8912-a3f851e7fff0@v8g2000pro.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!d5ni20802pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v8g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<106ae260-7347-4e32-8771-3858a1503af9@g33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <e9e297d5-52da-41fe-9090-bd96460d2a9b@e37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <7b414a17-07af-4e9c-8226-3bbaaaa5b235@u2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <8c6cacb7-98bb-43ee-b88d-4892cf2bcd8f@w5g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <1766c561-6603-4352-94ab-1bcf70559ca1@v15g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <73a7939e-6ca4-4545-82e6-bb1d309b6fde@v11g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <87vcroel8j.fsf@phiwumbda.org> <bb0f8cba-373c-416d-b0b5-792170d315ef@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <fdf16f53-7279-4474-97fa-b2705c1c5920@u2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <63647a02-341c-4a58-a2f5-c4dc1967c372@42g2000prp.googlegroups.com> <038b7b16-fd34-4435-82ee-ee7ec9a2b9b2@v38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <bf8bf1e7-7e7d-4db8-808b-6b1287946714@h39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9ec3e103-246c-4588-b850-fd9f004862d6@h5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,6ffd34a905b67f04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,6ffd34a905b67f04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,6ffd34a905b67f04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fd648,79e4b6580f667c81
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,gid54ac8f410d,gid9ef9b79ae9,giddb42311052,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.27.230 with SMTP id w6mr24611376pbg.3.1318841841009;
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!d5ni20802pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v8g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Graham Cooper <grahamcooper7@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,aus.science
Subject: Re: A definition of an infinity, perhaps!?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <a145cecd-9c0f-4779-8912-a3f851e7fff0@v8g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
References: <106ae260-7347-4e32-8771-3858a1503af9@g33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<e9e297d5-52da-41fe-9090-bd96460d2a9b@e37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
<7b414a17-07af-4e9c-8226-3bbaaaa5b235@u2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<8c6cacb7-98bb-43ee-b88d-4892cf2bcd8f@w5g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
<1766c561-6603-4352-94ab-1bcf70559ca1@v15g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
<73a7939e-6ca4-4545-82e6-bb1d309b6fde@v11g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
<87vcroel8j.fsf@phiwumbda.org> <bb0f8cba-373c-416d-b0b5-792170d315ef@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
<fdf16f53-7279-4474-97fa-b2705c1c5920@u2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
<63647a02-341c-4a58-a2f5-c4dc1967c372@42g2000prp.googlegroups.com>
<038b7b16-fd34-4435-82ee-ee7ec9a2b9b2@v38g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
<bf8bf1e7-7e7d-4db8-808b-6b1287946714@h39g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <9ec3e103-246c-4588-b850-fd9f004862d6@h5g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 42.241.122.221
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1318841840 21091 127.0.0.1 (17 Oct 2011 08:57:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v8g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=42.241.122.221; posting-account=EsDGawkAAAAN6xcF2fi-X0yb3ECD-3_I
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HNKUARELSC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable